Thursday, November 20, 2008
Monday, November 17, 2008
La Raza hate culture kills another American
In killing blamed on (illegal) immigrant, woman's kin want answers Houston & Texas News Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
Every murder by an illegal Hispanic immigrant is the result of a racist movement known variously as La Raza, MeCha, Atzlan, and other names. It's a movement as schizophenic as it is evil. Members are not sure if they are from Spain or are the original Aztecs of Mexico, but they are united in what they hate: Anglos. They are fueled by racist jealousy of any American success, which they have historically viewed as somehow insulting to Latin America, since the latter is seemingly permanently in a state of incompetence and corruption. What these bigots couldn't win on a field of human endeavor, they are trying, and succeeding, on winning on the field of crude biology--overpopulation. They even have a cute phrase for it, "We shall overrun." Isn't that nice? Live in mud and disease, just as long as that hard working neighbor of yours is flattened. Remind you of some other bigoted people? The "Palestinians" for instance? No coincidence, since they too hold to a corrupt ideology, in this case Islam, and are eternally jealous of their hard working Jewish neighbors.
Of course, quisling Americans like Bush, Ted Kennedy, Obama and McCain are also to blame for every murder by illegal immigrants, because these characters have done so much to undermine the immigration system and destroy all sense of border security.
....
Saturday, November 08, 2008
Gay leftists get bit by their regressive immigrant pets
The left is nothing if not suicidal. Here is perfect example of how leftists "create what they hate."
Now, it is clear that the most progressive people in the United States come from its native, non-immigrant population. Most of these progressives are "white." Even the so-called evangelicals are far more liberal than most immigrant populations, such as Muslims, and even Hispanics.
But the left has visceral contempt for "whites," or anything familiar--boring to them--like Western culture. The left is addicted to foreignness, and "exotica." Immigrants, whether illegal or not, superficially fit that bill even though they are really the vast majority of humanity--not exotic at all. Immigrants from underdeveloped countries offer a double for insulated leftists--they are "different" from the hated "white" American culture, and they provide a way for leftists to act out their aggressions against more pragmatic Americans by concocting a strategy of phony moral superiority. So sure in their political correctness, even studying the suitability of immigrant cultures for integration into the United States is a condemned as being a racist act.
But then came the referendum on gay marriage in California. All the unreconstructed regressive cultures invited in the last forty years, particularly the last decade, are reverting to form. Mexicans are bringing with them their corrupt system of government and their anti-gay machismo and religiosity. The Muslims, anti-gay by definition, voted down a gay marriage initiative. Un-Westernized Asians too are voting down gay marriage. California, once a solidly Republican state that not only tolerated, but spawned the tolerant 60's California cultural paradise, is now quickly degenerating into an overcrowded, polluted, stressful third world-like state. Gay communities are shrinking. No doubt, this will send many back to the closet.
But gay leftist idiots aren't about to admit they made a mistake by inviting in massive numbers of regressive immigrants. They are not about to have the balls necessary to picket mosques and denounce anti-gay Muslim imams gathering power to have gays beheaded one day. No, the left only attacks enemies who are civil and polite, such as conservatives that work within the system to achieve change. Thus, leftists are targeting Mormons, who have a minor presence in the state, but are mostly "white," therefore, they are a natural target of the left's frustration.
Prop. 8 protesters target Mormon temple in Westwood - Los Angeles Times
....
Thursday, November 06, 2008
J'accuse: Obama leftists ignore the real cause of environmental destruction--overpopulation
Daily Express Express Yourself :: BBC shunned me for denying climate changeIt is becoming very apparent that global warming is all but a complete fraud.
The real cause of environmental destruction worldwide is overpopulation. It is the driver for physical destruction of rainforests, pollution, and the raping of our oceans for food. It is even the main cause of increased carbon dioxide use, which is blamed for global warming.
But overpopulation is a very inconvenient reason for leftist bigots and their Islamofascist friends. Why? Because it can not be blamed on developed, mostly Western, countries--the countries that leftists and Islamofascists blame for everything. What's worse for them, the blame for overpopulation really rests on Islamofascist countries and third world leftist dictatorships. Namely, all of Africa and the Middle East and much of Latin America and SE Asia.
The countries of the unholy Islamofascist/Leftist alliance are the true drivers of global environmental destruction. They create such misery that their people try desperately to leave and settle in the developed and free but poorly defended West. Once there, these still-indoctrinated people usually revert to form and continue their pattern of overpopulation, thus eventually destroying their new countries as well.
These are Obama's favorite countries. Remember that.
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
Obama: Messiah of greed
Watching the hysterical reactions to Obama's election win, one would think Obama had been the first person of African descent to ever have an opportunity to succeed any where, any time in history. But one look at the globe would tell us otherwise. People of African descent are in complete and utter control of vast sections of the world. Most if not all of Africa proper is completely controlled by indigenous Africans, depending on how you classify North Africa. This land mass by itself is several times larger than all of Europe. Head over to the new world, we see most of the Carribean islands are controlled by people of African descent. Go to South America, we see a large part of Brazil, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana. Up in the United States, several of its largest cities are run by African Americans, including the nation's capital.Prediction: The Bush team will not vandalize the White House before turning it over to Obama
Remember how Clinton's team vandalized the White House before turning it over to the incoming Bush adminstration? That's leftism in action. Pettiness, meanness, control and sadism masquarading as emotion and concern.http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CEFDE163CF931A25755C0A9649C8B63
If McCain had won
Demo leftists now want everyone to "come together" after the election of their "messiah" Obama. Bush and McCain have already gushed all over Obama with undeserved praise. No one seriously thought Republicans would be anything but moderate and orderly about suffering a defeat.Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Obama: "I have a dream. It's called together but unequal"
America now is ruled by a leader that has written extensively about the inferiority and evil of European Western culture. A leader who has written, spoken and generally fixated on the selfish act of collecting "the spoils" for his chosen culture (not his "white" side, in other words, which he has explicitly rejected.) Sunday, November 02, 2008
Obama's Great American Beauty Contest - A delicate radical discovers America
From the link:
" Great American Beauty Contest stars Joanna Cameron as a fire-breathing feminist who enters the contest of the title. She plans to win the crown, then utterly destroy the contest by delivering a scathing attack on exploitation and sexism instead of an acceptance speech."
of delivering her speech, Cameron is so seized by the moment, the glory of winning the beauty contest, she completely embraces the whole process, smiling and waving and crying to the camera like every other girl had done so before her. Off stage, Cameron's radical feminist girlfriends are screaming livid that things have taken a turn for the traditional.See any analogy to Obama's recent embrace of American values and the inherent "goodness of America?" His recent statement, though self-serving, that winning his party's nomination "vindicated his faith in America" is more evidence of the deradicalization Obama is going through. His wife, Michele Obama, says as much in her statement about being proud of her country for the first time in her adult life while campaigning for her husband.
In other words, the blind, radical Obamas, who have sat in a radical black racist "church" for twenty years, are finally beginning to see what most Americans have noticed for a couple of generations. That America is all it's cracked up to be--a humane nation with authentically good core values. But the Obamas choose to play resentful victims all these years, although they've done a brilliant job of hiding it from the uninformed.
Sorry Obamas, the election is a little late for road to Damascus conversions. Now, it's highly unlikely Obama will become a Reagan conservative, even with his new view of America. The best we can expect is his heart will actually believe the liberal drivel he says to liberal "white" crowds. In other words, he may become a "black" Biden. Not very exciting, or "radical," eh?
If only he was a Reaganite, though. I'm against "affirmative action" performed by the government, which is just quotas and reverse-racism, but I'd practice my own personal affirmative action in a heartbeat, if an African American candidate came along that had the mix of values, leadership, knowledge and competence I admire.
In a saner world Obama would be sent back to Illinois to fully discover the America he has overlooked his entire radical-fawning life, now that he has a taste of it. Like Sarah Palin said in her nomination address, ""The presidency is not meant to be a journey of personal discovery."
Jihad Watch gets excommunicated by Charles "Little Green Balls" Johnson
Seems that Charles Johnson, head master at "Little Green Footballs" (I've always hated that name, thus I never read it), is defaming Robert Spencer, the godfather of anti-jihad (Bat Yeor is the godmother). Apparently Johnson is a megalomanic and periodically bans contributors for alleged offenses such an crypto-nazism. You know, the kind of vile "racism" that Obama's grandmother is guilty of, which santimonious "crypto-leftists" like Christ Matthews, Keith Olbermanniac and Ted Kennedy have vowed to cleanse from the Earth. Kennedy does it to assuage his personal guilt for being a grotesque, drunk, philandering, Harvard-cheating, manslaughtering pig. Not sure what Christ M., Keith and Charlie did.Just for the record, Spencer is even less racial than most moderate Europeans worried about encroaching jihad. Saying Spencer is a neo-nazi is like calling the Egyptian Copt Father Zakaris or an Yemanese Jew a neo-nazi. It is an inversion of reality.
Anyway, "Torquemada" Johnson also believes Brussels Journal, which Jihad Watch links to, is a cryptonazi publication because it is interested in the survival of Western culture--just like other cultures are interested in survival--and it mentions race in less than the masochistic terms (that the Left requires of "whites")--just like other cultures do.
Who else supports Brussels Journal? Only Opinion Journal, the Wall Street Journal's opinion magazine. Brussels Journal is listed in the elite group of Opinion Journal Federation links, with its logo no less:
http://opinionjournal.com/federation/ (scroll to find Brussels Journal link)
Jihad Watch: Life TV: "Islam and the Arts"
Jihad Watch: Life TV: "Islam and the Arts"
Islam itself is performance art--the few oppressing the many. The few are the clerics, the many are both average muslims and non-muslims. We are all caught on the self-perpetuating stage of Islam's dead founder whether we want to be or not.
....
Friday, October 31, 2008
Wanted: A reasonable third party candidate
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Obama's wacky war logic: Iraq is too expensive, so get out and expand war in Afghanistan
Obama and I have something in common. We both think the war in Iraq is absurdly expensive, especially during America's financial crisis. He constantly reminds voters we cannot afford to spend $10 billion a month there, and hey, by the way, Iraq has a surplus $80 billion it should use to rebuild. That's about were the agreement ends between he and I.No matter what your opinion of starting the war and nation building of Iraq, one must admit we are very close to achieving a victory of sorts, if you don't mind the continued official Islamic nature of the country, which apparently the Bush admin doesn't (I do).
So Obama would throw away the near victory in Iraq, and concentrate on an abysmal situation in Afghanistan, by ramping up our involvement.
Our generals in Afghanistan say the situation is much worse there than Iraq ever was in terms of the possibility of defeating the jihadists and rebuilding the country to any reasonable extent. In other words, going from the present 30,000 troops to 150,000 as in Iraq might begin to get a handle on the situation, but very likely not. Obama would need to spend $10 billion a month in Afghanistan if he really plans for America to achieve a military victory there.
PHOTO: Obama saying he can deliver more jizya to Afghan leader once the Iraq war is ended.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Flippant Biden lies, Obama campaign reacts to tough questions by gagging media
Let's break down Biden's mendacious answers:
1. He morally equates McCain's ignorant but superficial off-hand compliment to ACORN, the corrupt and racist "voter registration" group, with Obama's deep involvement in ACORN as one of its community organizers. Biden sure knows today's politics. He doesn't have to fool intelligent and informed voters; he just needs to fool the vast majority of stupid and/or uninformed voters to win an election.
2. Jarred by the reporter essentially doing a "the emperor wears no clothes" routine by comparing Obama to Marx, Biden ridicules the question, asking "Is this a joke?" To another question, Biden, incensed, says, "He is not spreading the wealth around." This was in response to asking about Obama's comment "My plan will spread the wealth around." Hmm, seemed like a fair question, no? As far as the validity of bringing up Marx, Obama's own biography gives ample reason:
Obama said, “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully.The more politically active black students.The foreign students.The Chicanos.The Marxist Professors and the structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets.At night,in the dorms,we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism,and patriarchy.When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society’s stifling constraints.We weren’t indifferent or careless or insecure.We were alienated."
Not abandoning his trendy Marxist inclinations after college, Obama has spent 20 years sitting in the pews of a racist "Christian Identity"-for-African Americans church led by a psycho named Jeremiah Wright. This church has endorsed the gruesome murderers known as Hamas and Louise "kill the blue-eyed devils" Farrakhan and his racist Nation of Islam. Wright is a classic anti-semite, molded at his upper middle-class school in Philadelphia where he could not keep up with the Jewish majority, very like how Hitler incubated his anti-semitism to hide his jealousy of his brilliant Jewish classmate, the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein.
3. To the question of whether Obama plans to turn the United States into a socialist country like Sweden, Biden says, "I don't know anyone who says that except the far right wing of the Republican party." Really? I'm an independent who voted for the Democrat Jim Webb for senator of Virginia in 2006, and I believe it. I suspect many others do too, including on the left, who actually know something about Obama.
As is obvious in Obama's own words and actions, this is a fair question. It is more than fair. Based simply on his associations and writings, it would be fair to replace Sweden in the question with Cuba, quite frankly. But the reporter was giving Obama the benefit of the doubt. Sweden is no totalitarian gulag. It is the best of what genuine democratic socialism has to offer. Ignoring Sweden's current below replacement birthrate and the parasitical, mostly Muslim, invader class threatening to bring its whole system down, one would be reasonable to say Sweden has a very good system worth emulating. I'd disagree that such as system is viable in the United States though. Given our cultural makeup, it is far more likely we would go the Venezuelan/African route of socialism, which is disaster. I also think Sweden could in fact do even better with more capitalism, as well as a dose of self-pride and stronger, larger, indigenous families.
The reporter bluntly asked Biden direct questions. He bristled at the questions, than assumeed someone other than the woman wrote them. Sexist pig? You bet. The fact is, the only way to get these sleazy politicians out of their comfort zones is to ask the tough questions. I'd say "hardball" questions, but that term has been ruined by that sanctimonious self-hating Chris Matthews.
Post "inquisition," the "outraged" Obama campaign is revoking its ads to punish the whole TV station. In other words, media, don't you dare ask Obama tough questions, or you will lose money. Once elected, maybe your license. Crazy? No. It is hardly out-of-line to suggest this, given the left's penchant for political censorship. Worse, Obama tends to side not with moderate, traditional American liberalism, but the totalitarian international left. Is not Obama fully behind the Orwellian-named "fairness doctrine" to force, Castro-like, leftist voices onto people who would rather listen to conservative voices? They say it is to have "equal representation" on the last bastion of conservative media, AM radio. Is it not enough that leftists dominate all other media? Is it not enough leftists are on the verge of a triumvirate monopoly of our Federal branches?
Obama is not, and has never been truly alienated. He has always had friends. He has always been popular. Far from being a "minority," he has aligned himself with the world's vast majority that demonizes the fragile human rights-loving West, while offering no alternative, except maybe Sharia law and/or totalitarian cult-of-personality dictatorships. The only alienation Obama's experienced is the punch-drunk sort from reading too much Marx. He is partially indoctrinated. I don't think he has the temperament to be a Chavez or Castro, much less a Stalin. His leftism is ultimately a precocious, childish stunt, as was his left-wing campaign initially. Now he is moving to the center, but his campaigners are not. I think he will try to throw his "comrades" under the bus once elected. But the big question is, will they let him, or will they throw Obama under the bus, to remain there as a helpless figurehead to their malevolence? Remember Jesse Jackson, caught on mic, saying "I want to cut his nuts off." ?
Obama, watch your nuts, if you still have any.
....Sunday, September 21, 2008
Not a monolith: Islam's two biggest weaknesses (besides the toxic texts)
1. Muslims are involuntary members of the Islamic community:Islam depends on retaining its members by force, under threat of death. The mullahs must use coercion if sharia is to be observed, otherwise, Muslims would simply leave the ideology for one more compatible with their ideals. It is for this reason that Islam cannot rightly be called a "faith" because faith requires belief, and a person cannot be forced to believe something.
Forced faith is not only an oxymoron, it is inhuman. Persecuting, prosecuting and even murdering people for not submitting to a faith is a crime against humanity. Anyone participating in such acts is a criminal, and any diplomat that consorts with said criminals is a facilitator and accomplice to the crime. Islam is no exception; even a happy Muslim is still a forced Muslim. Yet many are unhappy as Muslims. They wish to leave Islam but need help.
2. Islam is led by a small number of leaders:
We often hear that Islam is the religion of 1.5 billion people, as though this in itself makes its doctrine valid. Its shear size is used to intimidate us, by suggesting there is nothing that can be done, as though it is an inchoate mass of people with genetically encoded beliefs.
Actually, Islam, as mentioned in weakness 1, is not a voluntary religion. There are enforcers, and they go by various names like imam, mullah, sheik, and ayatollah. Without them, Islam would hemorrhage members without end. The clerics have created for themselves a privileged position, as they saw early in life where the power and comfort reside in Islam. But as a ruling class, their numbers are naturally small. It is hierarchical, so the most prestigious clerics are very few. Without them, Islam collapses. Islam is not a monolith.
Photos:
Top: The threat of forced religion
Bottom: The spirit of resistance to forced religion. A 300 year old Belgian pulpit of angles standing on Muhammad. Now the pulpit is threatened by Muslims, as Belgians have let their guard down.
Monday, September 15, 2008
Rise of the Super PTA Moms: Palin + Obama 2008: Because two Messiahs are better than one
Let's face it, we need a mandatory career path for anyone running for President. Sure, anyone can be President, but how about proper credentials, or the requisite boxes checked along the way, or substantial work experience, and maybe an Executive Bar Exam?Until that happens (and I'm not holding my breath), we are stuck with the second rate and the corrupt. On that note:
Obama's stint as a Super PTA Mom, aka "community activist" in Chicago did little to change his neighborhood. Defying the Peter Principal, Obama progressed to becoming a Senator.
Palin's stint as Alaska's governor seems to be that of a Super PTA Mom on steroids--saving money here and there to save up for the Spring Field Day, without any real thought about graduate-level economics. Buy hey, don't knock what has worked, at least while Alaska's oil is over $100 a barrel. I like Palin actually, but Margaret Thatcher she ain't.
Both Palin and Obama together is what America really wants. Both political partys get their respective Messiahs, and everyone is happy, or at least confused enough not to riot.
Photo: This could apply to either the candidates or this article, depending on your preference.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
The Zinn Factor: Why Matt Damon and Ben Affleck are leftist zombies and silent on jihad
Actor Matt Damon is out slamming Sarah Palin in what appears to be a calculated verbal assault orchestrated by the Democrat Party. His latest role appears to be an attack dog for his new master, Obama.
Damon assaults Palin for her Christian beliefs, her motherhood, and who knows what else. I only caught part of the interview, but I'm willing to bet he said nothing about Obama's racist, anti-semitic, "Christian Identity" for African Americans, church. Damon only uses his secular reasoning skills when it suits him, in other words.
It is interesting to note that Damon and his childhood buddy, Ben Affleck, are both politically inclined leftists. But how did two action movie stars be such wimps politically? Well, leaving aside the notion that they cynically decided to espose leftist beliefs to succeed in Hollywood since the manly Republican quota was filled up at the time, we can assume their leftism is authentic. But from what early influence?
It turns out both Damon and Affleck were neighbors and friends of the most successful "one book wonder" leftwing historian in America. That would be Howard Zinn, author of "A People's History of the United States," a ubiquitous book on every liberal campus. Damon was so taken by his neighbor that he wrote him into his script for his movie, Good Will Hunting, saying Zinn's book will "knock you on your ass." Zinn returned the favor, by mentioning Damon in the intro to his book's latest edition.
Zinn's radical leftism made a lasting impression. The Palin attack is not Damon's first venture into throwing political barbs. Damon is also on record saying the Bush twins should serve in the armed forces, something he never did (I did, btw, in case you're wondering).
In Zinn's interview with the Islamist paper of record, Al Jazeera, he had much criticism for the United States, saying it was "in need of rebellion," But given this perfect platform, Zinn had no such criticism for Islam or the jihadists. Sick and twisted would be an understatement.
After 20 years of uncircumspect hallelujahs by the left, some more sober-minded leftists are seem to be reevaluating this tome. Zinn basically took America and turned it on its head. Its classic inversionism. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are merely euphemisms for capitalist greed and "white supremacy," according to Zinn. "To hell with your freedom," say the Islamofascists to the West, and Zinn couldn't agree more. To him, the world is 90% white, and 10% "people of color." In fact, the numbers are inconveniently just the opposite, but the wantonly innumerate left never lets the facts get in the way of their script about bewildered and innocent (fake) minorities beset by "white greed." Facts never bothered the German Nazis either, since they couldn't be bothered to find a solution to competing with the .5% of Germany's population who were Jews besides rounding them up and liquidating them. Apparently Zinn doesn't see his personal irony in attacking a minority for being successful. His book reads like a Mein Kampf against "whites." Pathetic.
Obama echos Zinn's sentiments in his own book, repeating his execrable "Rev" Jeremiah Wright, by stating, "White folks' greed runs a world in need." Rising up and seizing power "by any means necessary" is a theme of Obama's campaign.
Obama's message gives license to rob and kill, because who wouldn't attack their oppressor? Problem is, Obama's alienation and victimhood is fiction, derived from perverse history books like Zinn's, not firsthand experience. He has had a relatively privileged life, gaining through undeserved "affirmative action" as often as not. His anti-"white" rage is a primped and manicured, dandified sort that only the self-indulgent, bloated Left could construct.
Now, millionaire actor Matt Damon is the proud chattle boy of his new master, Barack Obama. Well, we can hope Damon at least feels less guilty for his genetic makeup now.
....
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Defeating EUrabia and Amerabia: Politician's Code of Conduct for Foreign Affairs (Request for Comments)
That is why I believe we need a brake on politician's slide into treason. I propose the following code of conduct. It no doubt needs improvement, but this may be a start.
I. Foreign aid shall not be given to nations that inarguably threaten your nation by word or deed or that discriminate against or persecute any of its own peoples or those of any nonthreatening nation.
IV. Continually challenge the right of nations that do not respect universal human rights to participate in international political or cultural organizations that do.
V. Never harm the general environmental integrity of your nation. Never finance the national budget by relying on population growth beyond the humane carrying capacity of the nation, defined as the point before overpopulation begins to undermine both sustainability and a standard of living that allows all legal residents to have full universal human rights, including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
VI. Respect and defend the inalienable rights of humankind, as enumerated in your national constitution and amendments, as well as universal human rights, in that order, and not associate with those nations and people who do not respect the later.
VII. Never legislate to resettle immigrants in mass as unintegrated foreign communities into your nation, as it is an act of autogenocide, worsened further if said communities are actively hostile to universal human rights. Only individuals and nuclear families that pledge to respect universal human rights are permitted to immigrate, with the goal that they strengthen your nation.
VIII. Always use accurate facts and figures whenever addressing a constituency, and avoid substanceless rhetoric, demagoguery or emotionalism.
IX. No subject matter is permitted to be demonized, or turned into a "third rail," but shall always be revisited when circumstances arise.
X. Never legislate policies that create dependent or elite classes of able-bodied citizens who are without economic or cultural value.
XI. National borders are to be strengthened until the possibility of them being breached illegally is minimized and rare.
XII. Illegal immigration disrupts economic and environmental planning, community well being, and national as well as local security, therefore, with rare exception, repatriation of unauthorized immigrants shall be carried out immediately upon positive identification, and foreign nations that are violating or neglecting the rights of their citizens or interfering in your nation's immigration security, shall be vigorously challenged.
XIII. Never legislate policies based on an beliefs separated from reality or ignore the policies and practices of foreign nations, cultures, religions and ideologies that may threaten yours.
XIV. Do not violate your national constitution by distorting its language, but instead resolve matters for the better through citizen education or procedurally change the law as deliniated by your constitution.
XV. Your nation's interests, as well as those of national enemies, shall be fully documented, and policy shall be created based on that knowledge, with the aim of strengthening your nation.
XVI. Do not make political parties more important than individuals or the good of the nation.
XVII. Violations of the above codes and others not enumerated here by an elected official or political appointee can result in any of the following, depending on the severity of the violation: loss of office, public shaming, prison, loss of citizenship.
Monday, September 08, 2008
Sheik Gordon Al-Brown Beholdens Britain to "the prophet"
This is flat out cultural genocide against the British people. What kind of threats or rewards make a person destroy the future of his children?
....
Saturday, September 06, 2008
Is aiding impoverished Muslims humanitarian or suicidal?
- There are many non-Muslim countries where children are in desperate need of education also. As a non-Muslim, why not them first? Doesn't logic scream for helping your friend's child before your enemy's?
- What are the chances these Afghan girls will get anything more than a rudimentary education, stunted by early marriage and perpetual morning sickness thanks to a local Muslim who is only slightly less devout (bloodthirty) than a Taliban Muslim?
- I have had an experience helping out third world peoples. I bought tools for a poor brother-in-law who wanted them to start a business. Frustrated that he still didn't have a vehicle, he decided to burn the tools in a fire. In other words, unless you are planning to finance impoverished people lock, stock and barrel, you may just make them more frustrated and resentful for not acheiving your level of wealth.
- Finally, my friend just didn't get Islamic ideology. He saw Islam the same way as does an average hapless Muslim who has to be forced to feel hatred for non-Muslims. But for the devout mullah and imams who are in charge, there is no need for reinforcement. It's like the Nazis, of course. While normal Germans needed to be continually propagandized into anti-semitic hysteria, for the Nazi leadership, this was not necessary. Hitler and Himmler were fully aware of the decency of the vast majority of Jews, but that fact did not change their desire for a Final Solution. The same for the mullahs and imams. They are loyal only to the books of Islam, period. For a devout Muslim, a friendly kaffir is like a friendly lamb. He still must have his throat slit one day--even if he once taught your daughter to read--or maybe especially so.
Portraits of Inversionism: Islam "turning freedom of espression into restriction of expression"
Attempts to shut down criticism of Islam are still on the table at the UNThe National Secular Society, together with the International Humanist and Ethical Union, has been working over the past year to try to raise the alarm about the concerted efforts by Islamic groups to write blasphemy laws into international human rights legislation.
Our efforts seem to be paying off, as other countries and organisations begin to appreciate the profound dangers to free speech posed by proposals from the 57-member Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC).....(continued)
Wednesday, September 03, 2008
Two Races of Consequence: Europe vs. EUrabia and The Living vs. Islam
We here in America will shortly get to chose between bad and worse, and I'm not sure which one is which. In other words, this election race does not have much consequence, because the results are already known. The election will simply be a formality. Tweedledumb or Tweedledee are just two different poisons yielding the same effect--a big negative one for America, although I'm still willing to be surprised.
There are two consequencal races that the West needs to take notice of though. But politicians won't be the ones deciding them. Indeed, they, as a group, are the ones who got us into 
these races, which are races for survival. These races will be won by the people of the West or who represent the same values of the West--the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as well as respect for human rights and the preservation of humane cultures.
Europe vs. EUrabia
The players in this race are not as obvious as it may appear. It is not against Muslims. They are merely the ruthless invaders who fill the void created for them by European Union politicians. Eurabia is an artificial construct of the European Union. The race I'm referring to is between the unelected politicians racing to wipe out their treasonous tracks by completing Eurabia, and the will of free, Western peoples and their fellow travelers to wrench Europe back onto its path of liberty, enlightened culture and human dignity. Beware architects of Eurabia. Stop trying to eliminate your culture. Your days are numbered if you do not turn around or step down.
The Living vs. Islam
Worldwide, there is another race. This one really is with Muslims. On 
one side their is we, the Living, who wish to continue perfecting our society through democracy and respect for human rights, and the other side, the indoctrinated Muslims who have no choice but to terrorize the world, attempting to impose a brutal, hateful and backward totalitarian system, as demanded by their slavemasters, the imams and mullahs. The race is over whether the Living will destroy Islam in its current primative form, or whether Muslims of thought can break the power of the imams, and transform Islam into a real religion in which people can join and leave freely, meaning based on faith, not coercion and death threats. The Living have no time to refrain from a full assault on Islam, until it is buried. Thoughtful Muslims better get moving.
Photos:
(Top) Is this how EU politicians want to go out? Like Mussolini? At the hands of their own people enraged by their political malpractice?
(Bottom) Islamofascist Mullah Dadullah.
....
Friday, August 29, 2008
Mindless on immigration: How Leftists create what they hate
In all honesty, immigration treason policy is bi-partison. The damage done by the corporatist right is just as much as that done by the anti-American left, although in this video the later is presented. All over-replacement immigration is bad, but ISLAMOFASCIST immigration, such as hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghanis resettled with plans for granting them citizenship, is extremely bad. Blame Bush, McCain, Obama, Clinton, Gore and all the rest of the bribed, corrupted and cajoled politicians when the imported jihadists kill.
Humanist Survival: 15 Commandments of the New Politics
1. Thou shalt not misuse immigration to import people to vote for you, your party or your politics, or who hold religious or cultural values inimical to universal human rights.
2. Thou shalt not give financial aid to nations that inarguably threaten your nation or discriminate against or persecute any of its own peoples or those of any nonthreatening nation.
3. Thou shalt know thyself and thy enemy fully, and create policy on that knowledge, with the aim of strengthening your nation.
4. Thou shalt not practice genocide or autogenocide, either physical or cultural.
5. Thou shalt not use substanceless rhetoric, demagoguery or emotionalism, but shall use accurate facts and figures whenever addressing a constituency.
6. Thou shalt not demonize a subject matter, or create a "third rail," but shall always revisit a subject matter when circumstances dictate.
7. Thou shalt not make policies that create dependent or elite classes of able-bodied citizens who
are without economic or cultural value.
8. Thou shalt not create an insular culture of beliefs that is separated from realities and that ignore the policies and practices of foreign nations, cultures, religions and ideologies that may threaten ours.
9. Thou shalt not violate the Constitution by distorting its language, but instead resolve issues by educating the citizenry or by constitutionally changing the law in order to make it better.
10. Thou shalt respect and defend the inalienable rights of humankind, as enumerated in the Constitution and its amendments, as well as the Universal Rights of Man, in that order, and not associate with those nations and people who do not.
11. Thou shalt never compromise the self-sustainability of the nation for short-term gain, for irrational reasons, or that require agreements with hostile nations or nations that do not respect universal human rights.
12. Thou shall not make political parties more important than individuals or the good of the nation.
13. Thou shall continuously challenge the ability of nations that do not genuinely respect universal human rights to participate in international political or cultural organizations that do.
14. Thou shall not threaten the general integrity of the natural environment, nor finance the budget through dependence on population growth that leads to overpopulation, as defined by the point that undermines long term sustainability and a standard of living that allows for all to pursue happiness with full universal human rights.
15. Thou shalt expect any or all of the following, dependent on the severity of political malpractice, for violating the above codes, as well as others not enumerated here, of an elected public representative or political appointee, as determined by a jury: loss of office, public shaming, prison, loss of citizenship.
PHOTOS: Politicians in the near future will find themselves in prison or worse for collaborating with political criminals. These Western politicians are guilty of major political malpractice.
....
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Obama family values: "He ain't my brother, he's a poverty-stricken loser."
PHOTO: Potential Harvard legacy student George Obama stands in front of his shanty in a garbage and human waste lined barrio in Kenya.
Bush's greatest moral failure: Ignoring the Islamic death sentence against ex-Muslims
All of Islam depends on the coercion, intimidation and threats of death that all thoughtful Muslims know too well when they begin to question the validity of Muhammad's dictates.Muhammad said, "Whoever leaves Islam, kill him." And so in keeping with this hadith, all Muslim-majority countries have laws against converting away from Islam, but no laws against converting to Islam. Some of these laws are strict, such as the death sentences in Saudi Arabia and Iran, and some are superficially mild, such as those of Turkey, which leaves it to vigilante Muslims to enforce sharia. All such laws are antithetical to human rights.
One thing is certain. Without the anti-conversion laws, sharia law could not exist, because no one would stand for it. No one would allow the mullahs and imams to run, and ruin, their lives. People would leave Islam in huge waves, knocking one another down to exit the stinking mosques. And the imams know it.
But apparently resident Bush does not. It's odd. Bush seems to make gesticulations to being a moral president, with an eye for injustice and compassion for the humble. Yet here is the greatest injustice of our time, up there with slavery as an injustice of the ages, and Bush says nothing---NOTHING!!! Think about it. Millions of people trapped in a religion, ruled over by thugs, degraded by criminal traditions rooted in cursing and murdering non-Muslims, or stealing their "booty." And Bush? What say you? (sound of an ant farting).
Instead, Bush holds hands and walks with the leader of the keeper of the Islamic flame--really just a smoldering stink bomb--as though banning all churches and shredding Bibles is just skippy for his 'ol friends, the Saudis.
Jihad-Clueless Candidates: Obama can't remember how many brothers he has (but he can count McCain's houses)
McCain ("...economics is not something I've understood as well as I should") , on the other
hand, seems indifferent to the money spent in Iraq. Worse, he has not explained how a "peaceful" sharia state--Iraq--will be anything other than another Saudi Arabia, or Iran, for that matter. Do we need another petro-powerhouse flooding the West with Islamic propaganda, threats, duplicitousness, bribery, and covert terrorism? McCain has yet to explain how rebuilding an officially Islamic state does not violate our constitutional principal of the separation of church and state. Imagine the United States government underwriting the Baptist Convention, for instance. Not addressing this obvious double standard is pure cognitive dissonance.On to the title of this article: McCain is so rich (not usually a bad thing, unless you're a rich Democrat talking about Republicans) that he can't remember how many houses he has, as he admitted in a recent radio interview. Now, this is somewhat profligate, I must admit. It shows a lack of concern with finances that only people who stumbled upon their money would have (in this case, through his rich wife, who inherited it). But then there is Obama, who is exploiting McCain's domicile innumeracy.
Obama owns one house. It is a small mansion (some of McCain's are small condos), but he would have us believe owning one house is a sign he is an ascetic. He doesn't mention how, when he wasn't so well known, it was financed through his crooked friend, the jailed Tony Rezko, a Syrian "Islamochristian"-type whose signature corruption style involves deals with the likes of the Nation of Islam and shady Iraqi financiers.
Losing track of your money is somewhat irresponsible, but losing track of the number of brothers you have, as Obama has, is completely repulsive. The press has dug up yet another Obama half-brother, this one living in total abject poverty in a fly and disease shanty in Kenya on less than a dollar a day. Obama is aware of this brother's impoverished existence, but in the years since Obama became quite affluent, and now a multi-millionaire, it's been cool with him. He just doesn't mention him; he's basically totally forgot about him, his own family. "For the price of a cup of coffee a day," Obama could have lifted his brother, who had only the misfortune of being born in Kenya, up from poverty. But he didn't. Now Obama wants to take care of your family.
Of course, this brother is a result of Obama the Senior's Islamically-inspired philandering--a lack of concern with off-spring among those who "emulate the prophet" in this regard. That brings up Islam, of course. Obama believes the sharia call to prayer is "the most beautiful sound on Earth." No mention what he thinks of the Islamic justification for killing ex-Muslims, polygamy, wife beating, child marriage (rape) , or the Koranic exhortations for violent jihad against non-Muslims or the degrading treatment of "people of the book" (Christians and Jews) under sharia law. This would seem rather more compelling for the voters to know about, post 9/11, than Obama's opinion on the incessant warbling from Muslim minarets. After all, Obama is the son of a semi-lapsed Muslim. He might have some feelings on the topic.
One wouldn't be faulted for wondering about the state of mind of a son of a Nazi, just in case one ran for President. The same applies for the son of a Muslim, especially one who wishes to be leader of the free world during a time when it is under vigorous jihad attack.
That is not to say it is not possible for Obama to be trusted. Indeed, some of the most committed and knowledgeable critics of Islam are ex-Muslims, such as Wafa Sultan, Ali Sina, Ayyan Hirsi Ali, Walid Shoebat, and Nonie Darwish. But Obama's purported Christianity is not exactly comforting. He seems to have discovered church when it was pointed out to him that joining one would further his community activism. Previously, he had expressed scepticism, if not downright disdain, for religion of all stripes. Obama didn't join just any church though; he joined one that esposes "black liberation theology"--the African American mirror image of the "white" racist 80's cult labeled "Christian Identity," except Obama's cult is much larger and more "mainstreamed." Obama attended the church for nearly 20 years while it's egregious anti-Semite, anti-"white," ex-Nation of Islam (not quite Muslim) reverend, Jeremiah Wright, spewed hatred and victimology from the pulpit but never once stating where in the Bible he found the "white devil" passages he is fond of. Obama's church also has a close relationship with the Nation of Islam and its leader, Louis Farahkan. NOI is an Islamic offshoot that is based in "black" supremacism and a twisted tale about "whites" being the evil product of an experiment gone awry, carried out by an African scientist thousands of years ago. This ideology is what Obama's silence condones, even advocates. Only a suicidal moron would ignore it.
PHOTO: Barack Obama's impoverished brother, George Obama, in front of his shack in Kenya. No word on if he owns several other shacks.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
This is your boy scout. This is your boy scout on Islam.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Murderous mu$$lims: Stop your hate. Stop your killing and raping. Stop your discrimination and genocide. Stop killing ex-muslims. Stop killing Hindus, Christians, Jews and Buddhists.
....This is your women's soccer. This is your women's soccer on Islam.
Monday, August 25, 2008
Friday, July 25, 2008
Randy Pausch: Vile Kaffir, Brilliant Human
If for some crazy reason you have not heard of Mr. Pausch's trials and triumphs over the last year, his videos, writings and life story are easily found on the Internet.
Of course, this site is about the Islamic threat. Therefore, it is worth remembering that in Islam, Mr. Pausch is considered a dirty kaffir, either with the soul of ape, or worse, if he happens to be non-religious. I don't actually know his religious status, nor do I much care. He undoubtedly had, and has, more spirit than the entire bloody Islamic mullacracy combined, and he will reap vast rewards in the afterlife if there are any to be reaped. I personally think he's already at work, or play, making the best damn virtual reality machine God has ever designed.
No doubt, many cultural Muslims don't want to believe Mr. Pausch is a dirty kaffir. But that is what the imams insist, although few are so bold as to say so directly in such events. Islam is not a religion that guides by moral persuasion. It is not a guideline. It is a mandatory system in which Muslims are not asked what they think, they are just told to obey. The imams are the enforcers, and Sharia law is the legal code, as binding as federal law in dozens of Islamic states, and soon enough--if the imam's plan succeeds--your state too.To cultural Muslims: There may be more than a billion people forced to be Muslim. But only a tiny fraction are the enforcers. Dispatch the enforcers, and Islam will hemorrhage ex-believers like there is no tomorrow. Help make it so.
NO POWER FOR MURDEROUS IMAMS.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Portraits of Inversionism: Iran's Islamic Human Rights Day
As many blog posters noted on jihadwatch.org, this is quite the oxymoron. It is also a great example of moral inversionism, which I try to highlight as I come across them. A couple of other examples:
1. The UN Commision on Human Rights, which was so bad due to the inclusion of egregious human rights violating states the UN actually had to abolish it and start the only slightly less troubling UN Human Rights Council. From Wikipedia:
The Commission was repeatedly criticized for the composition of its membership. In particular, several of its member countries themselves had dubious human rights records, including states whose
representatives have been elected to chair the commission.[1]
Another criticism was that the Commission did not engage in constructive discussion of human rights issues, but was a forum for politically selective finger-pointing and criticism. The desire of states with problematic human rights records to be elected to the Commission was viewed largely as a way to defend themselves from such attacks.
Activist groups had long expressed concern over the memberships of the People's Republic of China, Zimbabwe, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, and the past memberships of Algeria, Syria, Libya, and Vietnam on the Commission. These countries had extensive records of human rights violations, and one concern was that by working against resolutions on the commission condemning human rights violations, they indirectly promoted despotism and domestic repression.[1]
On May 4, 2004, United States ambassador Sichan Siv walked out of the Commission following the uncontested election of Sudan to the commission, calling it an “absurdity” in light of Sudan’s ethnic cleansing in the Darfur region.[4] One major consequence of the election of Sudan to the Commission was the lack of willingness for some countries to work through the commission. Indeed, on July 30, 2004, it was the United Nations Security Council, not the Commission, that passed a resolution – by 13–0, with China and Pakistan abstaining – threatening Sudan with unspecified sanctions if the situation in the Darfur region did not improve within the following 30 days. The reasons given for the action were the attacks by the Janjaweed Arab militias of Sudan on the non-Arab African Muslim population of Darfur, a region in western Sudan.
2. The Durban Conference on Racism, which descended into a Malestinian/Islamofascist- dominated anti-semitic screed against Israel, and the 90% of the world population that are so-called "people of color" attacking a dwindling population of "whites" for all their problems, while ignoring their own racism and supremacist attitudes.
(Picture: Dukemadinejad at a Holocaust denial conference in Tehran, see earlier article for details.)
....This is your Persian Girl (500BC). This is your Persian Girl on Islam (2008)
PRESSURE THE UNITED NATIONS: Wednesday, July 23, 2008
This is your Ideal Grandmother. This is your Ideal Grandmother on Islam.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
This is your London. This is your London on Islam.
Monday, July 21, 2008
DEMAND IMAMS STOP KILLING EX-MUSLIMS: CIVIL RIGHTS FOR EX-MUSLIMS--NOW
Perhaps the most disturbing thing I find about Islam is the mandate that a human being is to be killed for leaving Islam. Mind you, this is no idle threat. It is not some ancient Mosaic law tempered and defanged by three millenia of Talmudic exegesis, for instance. Islam will have none of that. Mohammad himself insisted that reinterpreting his words is itself a capital offense.
Every Muslim country threatens Muslims with punishment up to and including death for leaving
Islam. Iran at this time is seeking to impose harsher penalties for so called "apostasy"--a mandatory death sentence, rather than leaving it up to the discretion of a judge to give death or jail (and obligatory torture). In Iran, it is essentially a shoot on sight policy for known ex-Muslims. Despite this, there is a sizeable underground ex-Muslim community in "Dar al Islam." Such is the magnitude of revulsion with Islam for those thoughtful, brave people most familiar with it. Death does not intimidate them. I receive weekly emails from Voice of the Martyrs (real martyrs, that is) about the most horrendous tribulations that covert Christians must endure under Islam. (I'm admittedly only nominally Christian, btw.)This murderous aspect of Islam is so vile and horrific that Westerners as a whole are not able to grasp the totality of it. There is simply massive cognitive dissonance. We automatically suspect it is a rumor or exaggeration, or we play a little game I call "time-shifting" reality, by fooling ourselves into believing it would be hypocritical to judge them since Europeans killed "apostates" in the Middle Ages. As if this is a legitimate argument for inaction, not to mention--unlike Islam--there is no textual basis for it in Christianity, which is why it stopped.
Murdering ex-Muslims totally belies, undermines, and destroys the credibility of Muslim talking points on a host of issues:
1. How many Muslims in the world? It is moot, until all are free to make their own choices in religion.
2. How can anyone possibly take Muslim countries and their representatives seriously with such a law in place? Indeed, how can we consider not punching these pigs in the face in the name of all humanity?
3. Muslim civil rights? What? To force millions to remain in a religion they do not wish to be in? It is an absurdity, wrapped in a joke, encased in a tragedy. Yet, Muslims get more deference in Western countries than cultural Westerners themselves.
4--1000. (too many to list)
Note to the uninitiated: If a Muslim apologist tells you that Islam states "there is no compulsion in religion," ask, then why does every Muslim country have laws that threaten Muslim "apostates," if it were not because of Islamic scholars advising the government? Ask, is that not takiyya, meant for non-Muslim consumption, to hide the monstrosities of Islam? Is that not from an early Meccan verse, abrogated by the later, more aggressive Medinian? Ask, would Islam survive six weeks if Muslims had no fear of leaving it? Would Muslims voluntarily surrender their human rights to Sharia law, just to remain Muslim? Finally, ask: Are you not cherry-picking a seemingly humane verse out of context, of which any purported humanity in it has been expunged and explained away by 1400 years of jihad and Islamic tafsir, or commentary, by the most learned Muslims?
Picture: Dukeminajad. This photo has no direct relation to imams killing ex-Muslims. It is simply a photo that I believe should get more exposure. Most Americans know the klansman Duke holds a grotesquely "iconic" status as a genuine racist and anti-semite, but few realize he has become weirdly leftish and unquestionably treasonous (as though he wasn't before--lol). This photo really exposes the true nature of the evil that emanates from Islam, especially its hardcore believers like Iran's Amadinajad. Here, the two apes are at a Holocaust denial conference held about two years ago, I believe in Tehran.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
This is Your Culture. This is Your Culture on Islam
In the middle is your culture under "moderate" Islam.
On the right is your culture under "radical" Islam.
The bottom photo is their method.
Islam is Pneumonia to a Europe With Mental AIDS
AIDS. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Of course, this is the disease that lowers the immune system's ability 
to defend the body against any number of diseases that attack it. Many of it's victims will die of normally treatable maladies such as pneumonia, or possibly some formerly rare cancer, like Kaposi's sarcoma.
murderous appetite.Article on Eurabia. Notice the critics at the bottom, who seem to live only in the present, with no memory of the difference between yesterday and today, and no ability to intelligently analize trends, or where we will be tomorrow. Such is the politically correct thought of lower-middle class minds. A better source is the book Eurabia, by Bat Yeor.
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Portraits of Inversionism: BBC Invents Christian Jihadists for TV Show
Inversionism is a process in which an ideological group finds to its horror it has allied with or even become the "boogyman" it has assailed previously. In full panic mode, rather than reassess its situation, the group attempts to "invert" reality. This phonomena is everywhere these days. "Inversionism" will be an ongoing series as I run into examples Today, I'm highlighting a BBC show produced by its resident leftists and Islamists that depicts their common enemy, imaginary British Christians (since, really there are so few of them nowadays), as practicing the distinctly Muslim habit of beheading.Daily Mail Article: BBC Bonekickers drama blasted for showing images of a Muslim being beheaded
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Dhimmi Politicians and Judges Turn Britain into Nightmare Monty Python Skit
Monty Python comedy skits were commonly characterized by a character 
acting outrageously, while the other characters are gradually drawn into the insanity. For instance, John Cleese as a army sergeant shoots a soldier during self-defense practice. The other students are horrified, shouting something like, "You shot him. Are you mad?" Cleese responds, "Of course I shot him, he was attacking me with a banana." To which they respond, "But you told him to." Soon, Cleese convinces the students to attack him with raspberries if he doesn't shoot, to which he responds by releasing a man-eating tiger on them.Today in Britain deranged judges and politicians repeatedly subject the general public to grotesque judgements and government, until the public no longer knows how to be outraged. The public accepts these rulings as normal, albeit confusing. Murderous and genocidal rulings contrary to national survival are reduced to simple political disputes with the common citizen in this fishbowl of insanity. Like "office tyrants," officials bamboozle the public into "going along" with their suicidal policies like lemmings off a cliff-- the madness of crowds at work.
Thus, today a lethal mass murderer walks the streets of London, released onto the public by Britain's criminally-insane dhimmi bureaucrats.
Story: Smiling preacher of hate Abu Qatada enjoying an £800,000 home and a life of benefits
Somalian Describes Future of Europe?
Switch a few words out, and this proud Somalian could be describing Europe soon-- a.k.a., Eurabia:
The attack on our society has many fronts, and particularly the destruction of our once proud, serene and unadulterated culture found its momentum today in everywhere in our communities. We are in identity crisis for the first time ever today in our own villages and homes, as the nation that was once vibrant and proud has been brought to its knees by its own people and by others who have seized the opportunity to finish the business that they have been longing for centuries. Our own Somali language has been diluted so much to the point that our heritage and cultural values are in the risk of becoming extinct.
This is not an accident that we just woke up to it, but it has been the interest of many Arab countries to force the issue of Arabism into the Somali people by way of adulterating and raping our language, so much so it got to the point that it could be replaced with Arabic language today.
Any available warlord in Somalia is running for an office and many for the presidencychair these days, or so it seems at least. A new breed of non-nationalists, unpatriotic, uneducated, mostly criminals, who committed crimes against their own people, are running for the highest office in government, presidency. They are fighting over on how many seats each one gets for his tribe, clan, or maybe "GILIB".
When I think about it, which is very often, I usually picture a horrifying scene where a group of hungry, gargoyled humans attacking a weak but attractive and beautiful lady, the nation, and each one is grabbing and pulling as many pieces of bones and flesh, internal organs and all, head or tail, while others are charging to have the whole torso (presidency) for themselves, for their clan, of course. Nowhere in that long shopping list that each warlord has could you see or read anything to do with rebuilding a nation, a Somali Nation. Each one thinks it is someone else's responsibility, the rest of the world, for that matter, to deal with the question of rebuilding the nation.
(Commentary continued here.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
Islamist/Leftist Axis Reverse Gears on Caterpillar Boycott after Terror Attack: "Send More Bulldozers!!," They Demand
The murderous campaign to eliminate the only thoughtful country in the Middle East continues unabated. The death club of Leftists and "Mo-bots" (brainstrung Muslims), continues its killing spree. Previously, the club demanded a boycott of Caterpillar Inc, because the company is the main supplier of bulldozers used by Israel to level houses of known terrorists as a desperate effort to stop further terror attacks. The recent attack by a Malestinian using a bulldozer to run over Jews in Jerusalem--the Jewish city that Mohammad never set foot in, except in his dreams, if that--has caused the death club to reevaluate its boycott. It now wants more bulldozers (or we can only suppose they do--actions speak louder than words).Islamic Murder Culture Spreads its Tentacles, Attacks Greenlanders
Even Greenlanders living in Denmark are not safe from Islamist butchery. In Denmark, Somalism, the form of Islamism found in Somalia, is particularly malevolent. Islamism spreads and grows, seemingly an inversion of Darwinism. Or is it? Is the progressive arc of history is but a fantasy of child-less leftists? Will the thugs inherit the earth? Or will rapidly modernizing and internally liberalizing China simply wipe out Islamist and debilitated Western countries in one fell swoop? Sunday, July 06, 2008
Why Restricting Islam is not A First Amendment Issue
Any creed that threatens, even murders, its members for leaving it is not a legitimate religion. A key attribute of religion is missing in Islam--faith. One cannot be forced to have faith. The Constitution was unarguably written for the benefit of people to control their religion, not for religions to control their people. Any legal recognition of such a reversal in Constitutional logic is an infringement on the rights of all Americans.
The doctrine and practice of Islam overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that it is an ideology based on control by an elite group, the imams, over involuntary masses. Islam has its own codified legal, economic, and governmental systems. In a material sense, Islam is a political system, not a religion. As such, the second amendment does not apply to it, although Muslims retain the freedom of speech in the United States. Non-democratic political systems are restricted in practice by the United States, although people are free to advocate for them. The government is also free to defend against them if they appear threatening, as we do, for example, with nazism, fascism and communism. One could easily argue that we should have known this about Islam all along, as even a cursory read of its history and core books makes clear. But with the history of the last 30 years, punctuated by 9/11 and countless barbarisms committed or sanctioned in the name of Islam by even its most high "priests," it is beyond dispute. It is now time that the religious imposter Islam take its rightful place among anti-democratic ideologies, exposed and ejected from the garden of faiths. ....The First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Saturday, July 05, 2008
Why There Hasn't Been a Direct Islamic Terrorist Attack on the US Since 9/11
Simple. Things are going swimmingly for the Islamists. They are cowing our school administrators, beholding our universities, bribing our elected officials, suing our defenders, 
infiltrating our military and police forces, censoring our artists and authors, proselytizing our youth, beguiling our President, intimidating our religious leaders, fooling our liberals, bankrupting our government, compromising our legal system, influencing our stock market, warping our culture, corrupting our rights and values, dividing our friends, burdening our institutions, murdering individuals, stealing us blind, buying and financing our next President, and last but not least, immigrating here and reproducing like crazy.
Why would they go and f-k that up?
Knowledge, common sense, and leadership could stop all the above in a Miami minute. But when?
Watch, please: http://www.usawakeup.org/ (hat tip, Atlas Shrugs)
(Picture: Wishful thinker?)
....
Friday, July 04, 2008
An Article on Taqiyya That Uses Taqiyya to Dismiss Taqiyya
Why Leftists Avoid Reading the US Constitution and the Koran
other words, the US Constitution may be as brilliant, progressive, fair, and democratic, as all those evil conservatives claim it is. That's a big problem for fans of Castro, Farrakhan, Guevara, Mao, and Stalin.On the other hand, their gut tells them the Koran just may be as murderous, intolerant, genocidal, unprogressive, reactive, unjust, repressive, oppressive, misogynist and bigoted as many of the same evil conservatives say it is (as well as a lot of easily ignored Hindus, Copts, Jews, Buddhists, and Iraqi Christians). That would not fit the anti-Western paradigm that the left has built itself on.
Great Saudi Scientists, Inventors, Artists, and Writers Who Never Lived in the West
Hellllooooooo. Is anyone home? Whatever. Ass salami like em.
I was expecting to find a long list of wonderful inventions by Muslims. Guess I'll do my own list.
1. He was Arabic-speaking Christian or even Jewish. Anyone Arabic-speaking or native of a Muslim-ruled area is often conflated with Muslim by Islamists.
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Is House Candidate Gerry Connolly a Terrorist? You decide. (I already did)
Gerry Connolly, chairman of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, slandered the name of outstanding, concerned citizens of Fairfax County during a public hearing last month (May 19, minutes 20, 42, 49) on the lease renewal of the Islamic Saudi Academy. Connolly denounced calm, well-mannered, obviously intelligent and law-abiding citizens as "bigots" and slanderers. Connolly choose to side with a foreign government that even a cursory glance shows overwhelming tangible support for Islamic terrorism. In short, Connolly's performance was itself terroristic, and meant to intimidate and shut down discussion. Connolly operates on one frequency, pounded into our collective psyche by mendacious professional "victims" and their allies in the media : Americans concerned with threats from "minority" ideologies must be bigoted. Connolly, probably ignorant of Islam, has nevertheless sided with terrorists. Ignorance of Sharia law is no excuse; worse, he chose not to listen.
Monday, June 30, 2008
Un-Wanted: Jolie of Hamastan and Mark Millar the Islamophile
have not seen. But hey, did Americans need to read every word of Der Sturmer to know it was anti-semitic? Or Pravda to know the Soviets had a problem with capitalism? Of course, not. The fact is, Hollywood movies have a predictable point of view just by analizing who produced and stared in them. We're not talking YouTube here, with its millions of contributors. Hollywood is a small, clannish family, relatively speaking, with a limited perspective.
Anyway, I think I have a scoop here. Debbie Schlussel, who normally has a laser eye for this sort of thing, failed in her review of Wanted to pick up on its anti-USA perspective; that is, the amoral, rootless sermons that leftists resort to if they cannot control society through totalitarian means. Schlussel's my favorite movie reviewer by the way, although sometimes she she goes a little overboard. Oh-oh, now I'll be on her sh-t list if she ever stumbles on this blog.Back to the movie: I was casually reading some gossip on Fox News about the new movie, Wanted, mindful that its star, Angelina Jolie, has taken an active position in favor of "Palestinians"--the Islamic ethno-club that menaces, "First the Saturday people, than the Sunday people." So the article mentions Wanted is directed by a Timur Bekmambetov from Islamic Kazakhstan. As I am an all-around great profiler in my opinion--which is humble--I found that slightly interesting considering we're currently in a existential war with the ideology of Islam. But semi-thankfully, I was raised in the "politically correct" world. We don't jump to conclusions. We are conditioned--and this is the "semi" part--to the point of autogenocidal meekness not to be reactionary. I know that being from Kazakhstan is hardly indictable, maybe even laudable to some people who view the land of Borat as "exotic." I am no expert on Kazak names. Perhaps he is of Russian stock. Maybe he is an ex-Muslim atheist. Or even nominally Muslim. I can deal with that. I try to balance out the conservative and the progressive: Trust but verify, as Reagan said.
Actually, there's not much info out there on Timur. I still don't know what his perspective is. But the article also mentions the writer of the comic that Wanted is based on--Mark Millar. Turns out, Millar appears to be another self-hating Anglo-Saxon, hardly worthy of his heritage. It's proof regression towards the mean is not just a genetic theory. Here is a pretty clear perspective on Millar from a commentary by a comic book expert at The Colossus of Rhodey comic book site:
Takes a lot of reeducation to find North Korea, the Muslim world and China heroic all at theMark Millar still hates America
I've previously written about the Scottish Marvel Comics scribe here and here and how he injects his leftist politics into just about any comic he is asked to write. As noted in the latter link, Millar writes The Ultimates, which is the modern "re-imagining" of the old Marvel super-team The Avengers. Back in that January post, I pointed out how in that Ultimates issue a super-team dubbed The Liberators had invaded the United States. These "Liberators" included super "heroes" from China, North Korea and some un-named Muslim nation. They invaded the US basically because George Bushian foreign policy has "run amok," and all the other countries of the world (well, those not in the West, that is) got fed up. Government officials are executed, the general population is interned, national symbols (like the Statue of Liberty) are toppled and destroyed.
same time, eh? Hollyweird is obviously up to its usual tricks again. And what is up with all these Brits? A few months ago, they gave us the Golden Compass, written by a someone who despises Christianity and loathes the Narnia series, but is typically mum on Islam. To use another movie analogy, it's as if the Brits are being taken over by "body snatchers" that replace their spinal fluid and rational minds with liquid dhimmitude. Such lowlifes, now entrusted to protect the memory of Shakespeare, Newton, et al. How much longer do we have until Prince Charlie, Compromisor of the Faith, finally tells us he believes in the Islamic Jesus?(Pictured: Jolie in Wanted; Mark Millar; Jolie in Hamastan, photo from http://www.debbieschlussel.com/)
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Gerry Connolly's Favorite Islamic Saudi Academy of Terror Under Emergency Review
County Board of Supervisors Unanimously Reverses Support for Islamic Saudi Academy,
Responds to Interfaith Coalition and Public Outcry, Demands Full US State Department Investigation.The United America Committee
June 24, 2008
Fairfax, VA
The efforts of United American Committee (UAC), as a part of an interfaith coalition of grassroots organizations, have resulted in the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors (BoS) calling for a full U.S. State Department investigation of the Islamic Saudi Academy. The UAC’s Virginia and New York chapters have worked with the Traditional Values Coalition, ACT! For America’s Virginia and Maryland Chapters, Center for Security Policy, and Stop the Madrassa to demand transparency, due diligence, and accountability from local and Federal government. This coalition has made a difference.(continued...)
On June 23, 2008, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, responding to public outcry, unanimously reversed its support of the Islamic Saudi Academy, and called for the U.S. State Department to investigate the school. Though the UAC applauds the BoS’s decision to demand such an investigation, the UAC disagrees with the BoS’s claims of ignorance regarding the ISA. Given the preponderance of available government reports, and the testimony presented to the BoS during a May 19, 2008 hearing on the ISA, the BoS only remained unaware of relevant information due to its own preference. The UAC questions how the BoS on May 19th, proclaimed their investigation of the ISA sufficiently resourced and conclusive, yet now claims the County lacks the capability to conduct an adequate investigation.
The UAC regrets that it took the arrest of the ISA Director General, another government report, and a protest to convince the BoS to finally take action and heed the warnings of the USCIRF reports that BoS Chairman Gerry Connolly called TVC member Jim Lafferty slanderous for citing.
The UAC also disagrees with the BoS assertions of impotency, as, on May 19th, it fully had within its power to delay the approval of the ISA lease until completion of a US State Department investigation. Instead it issued the ISA, and its now arrested Director General, an apology. The BoS has now called upon the US State Department to conduct the same investigation UAC and coalition partners requested on May 19th.
The UAC believes the BoS can do even more, and believes the ISA has abused the goodwill of its hosts. The BoS must stop passing the buck and finally hold the ISA accountable for its repeated lies and running a curriculum of religiously sanctified murder for almost 20 years. Accordingly, the UAC calls for the closure of the ISA and competitive bidding for use of the County property it leases.
Join the United American Committee, Traditional Values Coalition, ACT! For America, Center for Security Policy, Stop the Madrassa, and a growing group of concerned citizens, in demanding transparency, due diligence, and accountability from our government. Visit saudiwatch.wordpress.com on how to help.
For more information contact:
John Cosgrove
Virginia Chapter Director
United American Committee
571-213-4496
virginia@unitedamericancommittee.org
Monday, June 23, 2008
The Most Laughable List of Top 10 "Thinkers" in the World--All Muslim (LOL)
upon the world due to their common pyschotic ideology. Yes, you guessed it. They are so-called "Muslims."I admit, I am not familiar with most of these "thinkers." But that is hardly necessary in this case. Several of the ones I am familiar with completely delegitimize the entire list, and smear the good name of others listed who may be worthy--if one took such lists seriousnessly in the first place, that is.
Coming in at number three is Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the repulsive "moderate" terrorist imam who is the "Dear Abby" of the Muslim world, hosting a question and answer show in Al Jazeera. Aside from the pro-forma support for murder/suicide bombing in Israel, here is his opinion on conversion out of Islam:
"He is no more than a traitor to his religion and his people and thus deserves killing."
"whoever finds it serving the interest of his daughters should do it, and I
personally support this under the current circumstances in the modern world."
and will continue so long as his slave-like psychophants have exceedingly large families of educationally-stunted imam-worshippers.At number eight is the unctuous takiya-trader Tariq Said Ramadan. This guy is the proud grandson of the granddaddy of modern Islamic terrorism, Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood. The MB is of course the organizational ancestor of al Qaeda and Hamas, among many other bloody excuses to murder non-Muslims. Tariq, whose Swiss ID card keeps him safe amongst his dhimmi infidel friends in academia, really showed his originality and independence of "thought" by going into his granddaddy's business--intellectualizing the subjugation and murder of non-Muslims. Way to go Tariq! Put this list on your CV you f-ing pig!
THE LIST: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jun/23/2
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Islamofascists, Jihadists Unwittingly Aiding Red China's Imperialist Plan
Self-centered jihadists seem to not realize that defeating the United States , most likely by
bankrupting its economy or with a smuggled nuclear device, would be the worst thing they could possibly do to themselves. Without a United States to protect them, the jihadists would be fully exposed. A militant, totalitarian China would be the only superpower left in the world. It is inconceivable that China wouldn’t take great advantage of this position. For starters, poorly defended, oil-rich Arab countries would be easy prey for oil-hungry China . Small-time terror-funding sheiks wouldn’t even know what hit them.Officially atheist China has quietly become an aggressive and belligerent country convinced of its own supremacy and centrality in the world. Suicidal Muslim psychotics pose little threat to a robust China . China has 1.3 billion people, or one fifth of the world’s population,—more than enough to conquer a fractured world. The Chinese rulers are as ruthless as Hitler—but with 20 times his population at hand. China has an aggressive eugenics program and now has one of the highest IQ averages in the world, as well as a large population of educated and indoctrinated citizens. Even suicidal jihadists are afraid of China , evidenced by how little they support beleaguered Muslim Uighurs in Western China . With such a large energetic population, it takes little imagination to see why China covets vast foreign territory and would halt at nothing to take it, given the chance.
Still communist, Red China has revamped the “total war” concept, meaning nothing is off limits. The Geneva Conventions are but silly rules to China . Total liquidation of non-Chinese populations is not improbable from the Chinese government. With a world thrown in to chaos by crude Islamic fascists, combined with the killing power of today’s weapons, the world could be remade in China ’s image very soon.China is building its military at an unprecedented rate. Although China has said it is not averse to absorbing a nuclear retaliation, it is also working on technologies such as electromagnet- pulse bombs and nanotechnology that could knock out America ’s last defense of nuclear weapons before they could even launch.Once in command, the secretive technocrat Han-supremacists that rule China —far more efficient than Muslim supremacists—would not hesitate to rewrite world history and airbrush everyone but Hans out.
It must be stressed: stating that Red China is acting as a serious threat to the rest of humanity is in no way an indictment of Chinese culture and all its grandeur. No person of Chinese descent should feel threatened by the assertion that China is dangerous any more than General Eisenhower should have felt that loathing Nazis was directed at his German heritage. Obviously, he saw through such a false relation and so can every Chinese. Not incidentally, China would inevitably kill many “overseas Chinese,” including Westerners of Chinese heritage, by conquest using indiscriminate methods of destruction. Such a scenario parallels on a larger scale the deaths of Muslims killed by jihadists during “martyrdom operations.” For both jihadists and Chinese dictators, it’s all about conquest.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Roots of British Laddism and Hooliganism: Colonization by Jihad
So-called laddism and hooliganism are the popular terms for the moral degeneration of culturally British men (and women, despite the terms) starting in the 1960's as a reaction to the onslaught of a pernicious multiculturalism led by Islamism. Individuals like Ken Livingston and George Galloway--the kapos and quislings of our day--work specifically with Islamists to 
exterminate culturally British people and replace them entirely with people forcibly bound to an Arab supremacist, pseudo-religious ideology called Islam.Laddism is the British version of the gravitation toward hopelessness one sees in indigenous peoples with bleak outlooks throughout the world. The alcoholism, intellectual deterioration and prostitution that arises in groups that have been dispossessed of their culture and wronged by government officials.
Hooliganism is the violent, knee-jerk attempt to make government officials aware of their corrupt governance. The governing political left would admit this if it was not largely responsible for the roots of hooliganism in the first place--by lionizing non-Western terrorism and demonizing traditional Western culture. Recently, for example, an official report condemns leftist politicians:
The policies of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have helped to generate a spiritual, civic and economic crisis in Britain, according to an important Church of England report. Labour is failing society and lacks the vision to restore a sense of British identity, the report says in the Church’s strongest attack on the Government for decades. It accuses the Government of “deep religious illiteracy” and of having “no convincing moral direction”.The report, commissioned for the Church of England and to be published on Monday, accuses the Government of discriminating against the Christian Churches in favour of other faiths, including Islam. It calls for the appointment of a “Minister for Religion”, who would act as the Prime Minister’s personal “faith envoy” and who would recognise the contribution of faith communities to Britain across every government department.
--From the London Times
Of course, the left admits no such thing. It now claims to be horrified by Islamic terrorism and denys it is sucking up to the Islamists at the expense of Christians, particularly native Christians. The left, in its eagerness to liquidate British culture--which has always been optional, not a mandated culture like Islam's--creates what it hates: Islamic violence and dispossessed indigenous culture are new, predictable phenomena arising from leftist academic theory and political policies, helped by an amoral "internationalist" business sector greedy to import cheap labor.
But there is nothing tit-for-tat about this cultural genocide. There is no moral equivalency, no balancing of scales, in which the old colonizer gets colonized. Aside from upholding a dubious 
notion of justice by punishing people for their ancestors, the Islamists and their enablers are annihilating the British people and their traditions without bringing anything good to the table. In fact, they are bringing evil. They are imposing their "Sharia law" one community at a time, until there is no community, only the dictates of the hierarchy of bloodthirsty, greedy imams lording over groups of threatened people. Women in bondage, thinkers living in fear, artists in hiding, children abused. That's the thing with this "Islam," it is an ideology of coercion that holds it's members hostage, turning them into zombies who are then dedicated to turning other peoples into zombies. Islam has never regretted or made amends for murdering tens of millions of non-Muslims or turning them into pseudo-Arabs. It will always refer to non-Islamic cultures as in a state of jihiliya--ignorance.
The fact is, Islam--its seventh-century ways, its stultifying 
effect on progress and innovation, and its barren landscape of hopelessness after all its bloodthirty jihadist ambitions are met--has no future. The British people--studied in Japan for their incredible imaginations and innovations--must extirpate this evil--any coercive, totalitarian ideology is evil--and reclaim their place among indigenous, free peoples. Britain will continue to welcome other free peoples as guests, and even extend an invitation to join the British family--when it does not mean culturally genocidal multiculturalism, pseudo-colonialism or overpopulation. But Britain will no longer be a convention center for the world's terrorists and their collaborating dhimmis.
Friday, June 06, 2008
US Army Calls MSA--Muslim Students Association--a Terrorist Group. Will Universities?
educate employees about potential terrorist threats in their work environment. Unlike most of the tripe one hears from government bureaucrats on terrorism, this briefing actually had some meat to it. As in, it actually cited groups other than the usual Islamist suspects (Al Qaeda, Hamas, Iran, etc). It mentioned notorious Islamist front groups like CAIR and MSA (Muslim Students Association) as also being terror threats. MSA was correctly called a Muslim Brotherhood (the granddaddy of terror orgs) front with chapters throughout the university system in the United States.The security expert was not a anti-jihadist per se, in the way Robert Spencer, Wafa Sultan or Pamela Geller are. He obviously stumbled on this information as part of his duties and became quite familiar with the basic threat, without getting into the theology behind it. To his credit, he hit on topics that our fearless leaders, i.e. the Generals on up to the President, are afraid to talk about with "the people", lest we become unmanageable. I guess being low enough on the totem pole makes this specialist braver than the careerists who are more worried about perceptions than the safety of their "underlings."
It is not important if this security expert had the imprimatur of his superiors (actually, many generals would be mystified on who CAIR, MSA and even the Muslim Brotherhood are, now that I think about it). The expert was dispensing official Army guidance on confronting terror where the rubber meets the road--reality and protecting lives. He was not pulling punches, and lying to employees. A palpable wave of fear went through the room when he mentioned the Islamic groups who are buying up land along our important infrastructure nodes like dams, and conducting militia practice in obscure rural areas throughout the country. It was as though a group of generally sedated and lied to people suddenly had reality hit them between the eyes: an official government spokesman was telling them in blunt terms the severity of Islamic terror, and the fifth column menacing our nation.
The security expert mentioned MSA as a terror-laden group. Yet, our universities trea
t MSA like any other group on campus, giving it money and resources. This is absurd and traitorous. Either the Army is wrong (and its not) or our universities are, and they must henceforth eject this group from its campuses. NOW. 
Georgetown University in Washington DC seems like an appropriate place to start to eject MSA from campuses. It is allegedly still a Catholic university, yet it accepted 20 million in Saudi blood money to fund Islamic studies, and employs the execrable John Esposito as its in-house dhimmi Islamic apologist. Although it might come as a surprise to multiculties, Muslims generally view setting up shop in the heart of non-Muslim environments, such as a Catholic school, as acts of jihad, no different in its goal than blowing up a school bus of non-Muslims. That is why the Saudis are building a Europe's biggest mosque near the Vatican--to intimidate.
It's time to get a clue and fight back.
Here is the administrative contact info for Georgetown University:
http://publicaffairs.georgetown.edu/
Georgetown MSA: http://msa.georgetown.edu/
History of MSA (also known as MSU on some campuses)
(Pictured: MSA students and terror suspects arrested with exposives while looking for locations to bomb and kill non-Muslims in the United States; Bottom: Stereotypical madrassa students, angry over something or other. Possibly free piggy banks handed out by the local microbank.)
Thursday, June 05, 2008
World Muslim Population: 1.5 Billion People Muslim by Force; Voluntary Muslims: Zero
There are no voluntary Muslims. Not one. Not since Muhammad issued his order, "Whoever leave the faith (Islam), kill him." His edict is no idle threat, and is enforced today by imams, Islamic theocracies, and even common Muslims the world over. This by itself should be enough for every progressive voice to condemn this hateful ideology and work for liberating its victims. And just who are its victims, besides the obvious non-Muslim victims of jihad? Islam's victims are post-Muslims who live under death threats for leaving Islam, and the millions who want the courage or the space to do so, but go on pretending to be Muslim, living a lie.
The vast majority of Muslims are born into this ideology (I do not call a system based on force a faith) and never had a choice to join or leave it. Those who "choose" to become Muslim are not 
yet Muslim at the moment of choice. They are often of an actual faith, or secular. In other words, they are free to leave their belief system if they so choose. There is no coercion equivalent to the death threat of Islam for being a so-called apostate. There are no non-Muslim theocracies that kill or punish those who change their religion. With Islam, there are literally dozens of such murderous countries. And it is murder, pure and simple.
Muslim apologists attempting to validate Islam often cite as proof the fact that there are 1.5 billion adherents of Islam. Of course, this is not any more proof of validity than claiming Nazism respectable because there were 80 million Germans who once lived under that odious ideology. Or, claiming the mere fact that 1.3 billion Chinese living under atheistic communism make that system valid and respectable. Just ask the Chinese Christian or Buddhist who must hide his or her faith rather than attend an "approved" church or temple. Yet even China does not openly call for the murder of such believers, as Islam does.
But you say, "There are many Muslims that seem happy being Muslim." I did not say there are not. There are people happy being in jail, who even commit crimes just to get back into the comfort of jail, with "three hots and a cot." Especially many US jails, which a Russian visitor once said seemed like hotels. This does not make jail, or Islam, voluntary. It is a one-way entrance. Once you go in, you cannot just walk back out. Today, there are literally thousands of ex-Muslims who are in hiding in the West from their family, friends and mosque leaders. They live and communicate in secret. The Meetup.com group for ex-Muslims communicates in secret as to where they will meet next. Always, there is a danger of a Muslim attempting to murder them as his or her act of jihad. Violent jihad, Mohammad said, is the surest way to get to heaven, and receive the most rewards.
Happy, or at least grotesquely content, Muslims there are. The oil-rich polygamist with a different woman every night, yet has the okay of his power-hungry imam. The brainwashed jihadist, who can't wait to get to heaven, after murdering a busload of non-Muslims. The doltish Muslim woman, who is envious of other, smarter women, and wishes them to be in a burka jail with her. And of course, the real power behind the throne of the dead prophet, the imams, who keep Islam in place for their own lusty, greedy needs. These thugs, who can rule entire regions and threaten the world with Islam. Why wouldn't such bigoted minds love Islam? But voluntary Muslims? No, not even they.
It is nothing new that Islam is a prison. As we are told, Islam means submission. That implies force. Rarely is submission voluntary, and never for large groups of disparate peoples. We in the West must learn this now, or be submitted later.
(photos are of an Afghan who was force do leave Afghanistan after the US-installed government threatened to murder him for the offense of converting to Christianity. The second photo is an American of Pakistani Muslim descent who hosts a blog called "The Apostate".)
....
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Islamic Darwinism: Only the Thuggest Survive
ISLAMIC FRIEND OF REILLY 'STUNNED' AT BOMB PLOT
Islam has it's own "Darwinism": Only the thugs shall survive. Show a sign of weakness, a stutter, compassion, thoughtfulness, etc, and you are either recruited for suicide bombing, or labeled an apostate and murdered.
Aside from the hatred directed at non-Muslims in the Koran, there is a social basis for this phenomenon that has is well-documented by anthopologist's studies polygamy. Having too many males just makes more competition for the thugs (imams, sheiks, mullahs, ayatollahs) to get females, since the pool is low due to the Alpha-males marrying multiple women. That is, unless a Muslim resorts to raping "kaffir," which many do with enthusiasm when in "Dar al Harb". In Dar al Islam, non-Muslims are virtually extinct so rape is more difficult, although hardly rare. Best to have the excess males kill and be killed. Tell them its for "jihad."
That's not to imply Islam kills only to improve the thug strain, by sending weaker males to their death. No, Islam kills gratuitously also, whenever someone is a burden, for instance. Problem with your wife or daughter? Start a rumor and have her killed or do it yourself by "honor killing". Or, send her into battle so she too can be an inverse-martyr and blow herself up, but she won't be getting much in heaven, that's pretty much a man's world also.
In Islam, the thugs inherit the Earth and the meek inherit 72 white-skinned whouris in heaven (or 72 white raisins, depending on your translation).
(Pictured: Survivor and Chief Thug of Al Qaeda European Operations, Abu Qatada, recently released on bail from prison by English dhimmi judge, who must have receive a very full envelope for stabbing his countrymen, and non-Muslims worldwide, in the back.)
Friday, May 23, 2008
Muhammad and Saddam: Distinction Without a Difference
Do most Muslims have a double standard when it comes to praising or condemning the actions of their leaders? Please consider the responses to the actions of Saddam Hussein and those of Muhammad, Islam’s prophet.
When Saddam, master tyrant, fell through the gallows as his enemies shouted expletives at him, few people wept. Saddam’s brutalities are still too recent, with too many witnesses and photos, to have become mythologized by the passage of time.
Nearly everyone agreed that Saddam was a horrendous man, responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and others, whom often died in excruciating pain because of Saddam and his sons’ penchant for the sadistic torture purely for amusement.
Nearly everyone vilifies Saddam. That is, everyone except millions of Iraqi Sunnis, as well as admirers in various Sunni Muslim-dominated countries. For them, Saddam’s mega-criminality is not an obstacle to respecting, even adoring, him as the enemy of that perpetual “Great Satan,” the United States, as well as the slayer of thousands of “infidel” Shiite Muslims.
Neutral parties no doubt would say Saddam aficionados have simply lost it; they are wantonly blind to his evil due to their own personal prejudices. Some have lost their once privileged positions in Saddam’s Iraq, or they side with any enemy of the United States, i.e., “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Maybe they simply admire Mafiosi types of any sort.
The question for rational people is: How do... these “Saddamites” square this circle in their own mind? What mental forces are at play that can warp certain communities of people, some quite large in their own right, into defending Saddam in light of the prima facie evil of his deeds? Have these people been struck by some mass psychosis into fawning over a murderous thug? Regardless, the stark brutality of Saddam is still obvious enough for the majority of people to view him as a plague on humanity, and regard the dead dictator’s supporters as mentally deranged in their regard for him.
We know of other infamous murderers, from the relatively small-time Charles Manson to mega-maniacal Stalin, who continue to have their “groupies.” The groupies are widely looked upon with distain, if not creepy amusement, by the vast majority of people. The common view seems to be that their bizarre, indeed sick, sensibilities have led them into the camps of such villains.
Saddam, of course, viewed himself as an historical figure, no different in intent and demeanor than other autocratic rulers throughout history. He was well aware that these rulers meted out justice with a cruel stick. Reputedly, he was an admirer of Stalin, and a fan of the Godfather movie series. These elements no doubt gave him inspiration, along with the various cruel leaders mythologized in the pantheon of Arabdom. He aspired to be one of them. It is only Saddam’s misfortune that his star fell because of the modern development of human rights and the ability to visually and verbally record his crimes, often ironically done by his own minions, for the world to see.
Time, like fame and money, have a way of softening brutality in the public’s mind. Thugs morph into heroes, tyrants soften into wise rulers, and murder and torture are glossed over, made relative, or disconnected from the rulers. A few thoughtful words or a grandfatherly face from the monster will win over the wantonly naïve among us, (and there are many).
It is a matter of record that the activities of Muhammad would be considered severe human rights violations were they to be committed today. Like Saddam, Muhammad tortured and killed thousands of his alleged enemies, often collectively, based on nothing more than ethnic affiliation. In one notorious instance, Muhammad beheaded all the adult Jewish males of the Banu Qurayzah tribe, and had their wives distributed among the Muslims as “war booty.” Muhammad determined male adulthood by whether a boy had pubic hair or not. In other indicative instances, Muhammad had a poetess murdered for allegedly insulting him in a poem, and a purportedly 100-year-old poet murdered for the same thing. In yet another instance, Muhammad had alleged criminals put to death by chopping off their limbs, poking out their eyes, and leaving them in the sun to die. And so on, and so on Muhammad committed or oversaw other major human rights violations, including rape, theft, pedophilia and slavery.
These instances seem to be in line with the type of torture that Sadaam wrought on his people, whenever they got “out of line.” Yet, oddly, if we apply the same logic to Muhammad as we do with Sadaam—that his supporters have “lost it” and are simply blind to Muhammad’s crimes, it is considered by many to be in bad taste at the least, and a high crime by Muslims for “insulting the prophet.”
What gives? Does calling oneself the Prophet and claiming to act in God’s name simply a clever way of avoiding criticism by created a sort of cognitive dissonance in otherwise rational people? Does the shear weight of 1400 years of following a man’s ramblings makes it appear too foolish for cultures to admit the words may be lacking in some respect? Ironically, one way out is of this confusion was closed by Muhammad himself, which is excusing his actions as a relic of the seventh century, because Muslims’ claim there is only one standard for all time, which Muhammad delivered via the Koran.
I guess we’ll just have to wait for the deluge for the answer. So called moderate Muslims seem to be mum, or actively censorious, about discussing Muhammad’s possible crimes. Or do they think collective beheads, murdering poets, raping someone’s wife, etc, are not criminal when non-Muslims are the victims? And what of bedding of nine-year-old Aisha, who was definitely Muslim? Are they chagrined at such questions? It’s obvious that their outrage at “insulting the prophet” is not genuine, but is that of a liar, caught in a lie. The din just gets louder the closer critics get to the truth.
To Muslims: You know the above holds truth, but when will you face it? Yes, you will be under a death threat from fellow Muslims for admitting the true nature of Islam, but aren’t we all? It’s time you set yourself free.
(This article originally published in Mar, 2007 my Max under a psuedoname at http://islam-watch.org/others/Saddam-and-Muhammad.htm )
....
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Fairfax County Board of Dhimmis approve Saudi Terror School Lease
The Wahabbi Terror Institute, aka Saudi Islamic Academy, just had its lease renewed by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors by unanimous vote. One wonders what it must have taken to get this breathtakingly anti-American, suicidal act done. Fairfax is not Berkley, or Madison, or Cambridge, it is the bedroom of the Federal government. Were these monstrous "supervisors" paid in hard cash or promised free gas for life? Were they threatened by the Saudis if they did not vote a certain way? Or are they simply so feeble-minded and ignorant of the methods of Islamic jihadist terror--including propaganda methods--that they just merrily rubber stamped the lease, after the Saudis waved a few cosmetic reforms in their face?
Aside from the school's continued uncooperative behaviour with concerned regulators and its terror-ladden, racist Arab syllabus, what reform can possibly be made? It is the sponsor that is the problem. Is Saudi Arabia now a place where women can leave their homes un-"escorted" by a male relative, in clothes of her own choice? Or where a non-Muslim house of worship can exist? Or where a Muslim can convert to another religion without fear of execution?
The answers are: Of course not.
Mind you, this is after 9/11, on which 15 of the 19 terrorist who attacked us were Saudis. Politicians left and right say SA continues to be a major, direct financier of terror and jihadist indoctrination. The valedictorian of this very school is in prison for hatching a plot to murder the President of the United States.
Yet the Fairfax County board of supervisors chose to sleep with the Saudis. They have debased this historic county, now marred by this hate school on George Washington's old farm of Mt. Vernon. Those who cooperate this openly and directly with terrorists are terrorists themselves.
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
(from left to right)
Jeffrey C. McKay (Lee District)
Michael R. Frey (Sully District)
Catherine M. Hudgins (Hunter Mill District)
Gerald W. Hyland (Mount Vernon District)
Gerald E. Connolly (Chairman)
Sharon Bulova (Braddock District)
Pat Herrity (Springfield District)
Penelope A. Gross (Mason District)
Linda Q. Smyth (Providence District)
John W. Foust (Dranesville District)
....
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Question of the Year: Bush's Islamic vocabulary
I've stated before that we should not be rebuilding Islamic countries. It is aiding and abetting an enemy as far as I can tell, a most grievous offense punishable by death according to the Constitution. I say this as someone now home four years after serving in Iraq (WWII was only 3.5 years, btw). Rebuilding an "ISLAMIC Republic of..." is also a clear violation of the principal of separation of church (or mosque) and state.
I suspect we can save trillions and beat this enemy with strong, free words and common sense security (no Islamic immigration or investment into the West, for instance). We need only free ourselves from our horrendous self-imposed PC gag-order. Naive? Not half as much as a President who doesn't know he's a dhimmi.
(Pictured are Belgian anti-jihadists)
Entomologically Speaking, Islam is Arabic for Berserk
News flash! Islam does not mean peace!
I know, I know. Many of us grasped this intuitively over the years, despite what President Bush insists, even before September 11, 2001. That is a fair realpolitik position. Islam is as Islam does, in other words. But it also means the same as the Norse word berserk(r) — literally. First, some background.*
There was always, of course, a morsel of truth to the “peace” fib. Both Muslim and dhimmi apologists still trot out the one about how Islam and salaam, of “Salaam alaikem” (Peace be upon you) fame, come from the same tri-consonantal Arabic root, “s-l-m,” which is often translated to peace. Translations being what they are, this allows for a lot of flexibility, especially when one has an agenda other than total accuracy. Any honest Arabic speaker, that is, one not speaking “takiyya” to infidels, will tell you that the proper word for political and military peace, as implied, is “sulh.” Writer Lev Navrozov demonstrates this1 with an Arabic dictionary and a host of examples, like “to sue for sulh” and “to observe the articles of sulh.” A much closer translation of s-l-m is “calmness” or “resignation,” which is similar to the secondary meanings of peace, such as “tranquility.”
Navrozov boils down a host of translations for salaam. Its essential meaning is soundness or tranquility of mind and body. The Arabic greeting “Salaam alaikum,” often mistranslated as “Peace unto you,” is more correctly translated “May you have
good mental and physical health.” Nice sentiments, but hardly unique. Its true meaning becomes less sublime, leaving it undifferentiated from many other such greetings and toasts around the world. It equates to the endearingly trite American “Have a nice day!” and the Tibetan “Tashi Delek” (May everything be well), but is less exalted than others such as the Irish “Dia duit” (May God be with you).
Despite the banality of the expression, Islamic scholars forbid Muslims from greeting non-Muslims with it [2], implying that ill health to them would be better. Christian Arabs also use the phrase though, without such limitation. The word salaam also makes more sense in the phrase, “sallahu alayhi wa’alihi wa salaam,” said by Muslims whenever mentioning Muhammad, when translated as “May he rest in peace (tranquilly),” rather than the clumsy and confusing pseudo-literal “Peace be upon him,” as it usually is.
These days, except for the President, not even the mainstream media force the “Islam means peace” whopper on us anymore. The “peace” deal was merely the first attempt to keep the masses firmly on the plantation, illiterate of true Islam, lest they disturb the supranational-elite masters and their fragile relations with the oil sheiks. No, nowadays Islam means “submission,” often tagged with “to Allah” for clarification.
This, the mainstream media learned, is because Islamic scholars now tell us so. Islamic scholars also believe all knowledge before and outside of Islam is Jahiliya, or ignorance, unworthy of study. The Bamiyan Buddhas were symbols of ignorance, as are the pyramids threatened by Islamists, as was the ancient library at Alexandria, said to have been burned by the second “righteous” Caliph Umar. Jewish and Christian texts that pre-date Islam are declared corruptions if they conflict with the tautologically perfect (“it’s perfect because it’s perfect,”) Koran or Hadith, according to the scholars. Of course, they also insist all Islamic scholars must be practicing Muslims, — sorry Mr. Spencer, Ms. Yeor et al. — or at least fawning dhimmis — congratulations Ms. Armstrong and Mr. Esposito!
These days, traditional, as in most, Muslim scholars have a little problem. Past scholars could always hide an inconvenient truth. Today, obscure knowledge is accessible to anyone with a computer and Internet connection. We can now check up on assorted scholars, mullahs, sheiks and imams if we smell a rat.
So, researching but minding the caveat of being wary of much on the Internet, we find that capital “Islam” was actually once small “Islam.” Capital Islam, it turns out, is not the historical term for the religion of Muhammad. According to respected (by Islamists) scholar Carl Ernst, classical Muslims used “iman,3” which translates to “faith.” “The Faith” was what followers called their religion, in the same way, say, crime families have used “the Syndicate” or “the Family” to refer to their organization. The implication of using “iman” is that there is only one faith; the same theory of Jahiliya that destroys non-Islamic temples also excludes the reality of non-Arab religions. Islam was called Muhammadism in much of the West, until Muslims campaigned against the term because of its focus on their messenger, not his message. Interestingly, the term “Muslim,” or “Moslem,” as spelled until recently, is also modern usage for a follower of Islam. Muhammad used “mumin,” or “believer,” for someone who has fully committed to his precepts, while “Muslim” was relegated to those who merely had taken the perfunctory vow, usually under duress or surrender, called the shahadah. [3]
Modern Muslim and Western Orientalist scholars, searching for a proper name for Muhammad’s religion, if only for Western consumption, settled on “Islam,” taking a fairly obscure word used only eight times in the Koran. Pretty translations and inking new meanings for old words is a scholarly habit that has effectively helped create a faux Islam, acceptable for Western and secular Arab consumption, while the real Islam still exists widely among the Islamists, ready to seize and hold naive converts with its no exit strategy.
Of course, there is nothing wrong with giving old terms new meaning. For instance, after the introduction of the automobile, it became the dominate definition for the word “car.” The problem Islamic scholars have in ascribing a new meaning to “Islam” is that Muhammad did not use this term to refer to his new religion. “Islam” to him simply meant what it always meant to Arabic-speaking tribes. To Muhammad, “Islam” meant a type of submission, but not to God, who was not yet established among the pagan Arabs, but of submission or surrender of one’s desire to live, in order to become fearless in battle. According to, among others, Father Gnana Pragash Suresh, an expert on Islam with the Society of St. Pius X, Islam “referred to an attribute of manliness and described someone who was heroic and brave in battle” and who would “fight to the death” against “impossible odds.” [4] Ironically, submission to God’s laws is actually a concept developed by Christian monastic orders that Muhammad often railed against. It required moral firmness, while Muhammad’s morals depended on his circumstances, suitably converging with his most recent vision. Islamic morals only firmed once Muhammad had died, having left an often brutal legacy of conflicting statements and actions and the impossible task of sorting them out.
In other words, “Islam,” the word known to Muhammad, pre-dates “Islam” the religion, as written and elaborated upon by later Muslim scholars. Muhammad’s warrior definition of Islam, a very Bedouin concept, springs from the eye-for-an-eye code of his Arab nomadic culture. It is also very useful for spreading an ideology by force.
If further proof is needed, Islamic suicide murders perhaps capture Muhammad’s definition of Islam far better than scholarship can. Not counting confused teens, the mentally retarded, the blackmailed and the kidnapped, all forced to blow themselves up among “infidels,” suicide murders are “true believers.” Harvard-educated Middle East scholar Daniel Pipes coined the term “sudden jihad syndrome,” [5] to describe seemingly modern, normal Muslims suddenly killing kufr (infidels), often with the desire to be instantly transported to paradise. Suicide murders have sublimated their survival instinct to achieve a higher goal--either 72 virgins or a coterie of handsome young boys (Aside: Muslims insist these boys are not “homosexual,” as in, they are strictly “butch.” If unsure what a butch gay is, watch the movie Road Warrior, in which Humongous, “the Ayatollah of Rock and Rolla,” issues ultimatums to surrender just before his crew robs, rapes and murders caravans of productive, peaceful people as they travel through the desert (see an analogy yet?). Also, see Taliban rule number 19, “Don’t take pre-pubescent boys into your tent.” You get the idea. A finally example: Founding Nazi Ernst Rohm and his club of violent “ultramale” butch boys.). It seems “resigning” (s-l-m) yourself to an Arab god is not necessarily a good thing.
Segueing back to topic: We owe the word “berserk” to the Vikings, whose most violent and effective fighters were known as berserkers. In their Norse language, going “berserk,” or “bare-chested” had a much more philosophical connotation than the wild, uncontrolled meaning it has in English, which is closer the Malay Muslim loan word “amuck,” originally meaning “a manic urge to murder.”
The berserk ethos gave the Viking warrior an ability to face battle unencumbered by fears of death. Viking berserkers could charge an enemy without hesitation, even sans armor. Of course, most enemies, not nearly as cavalier about dying, would flinch in fear, making them easier to cut down. Or they would simply turn and run, giving the Vikings an easy victory. Incidentally, Viking contemporaries in the Near East, the Muslim Hashashiyyin (root of “assassin”), were specializing in suicide missions against their religious enemies, induced by sexually-charged visions of paradise. Even without a suicide theology, no doubt the sanctioned hording of women, polygamy, by dominant males leaves many mate-less males looking elsewhere, such as toward boys or to the next world via a “quick ticket,” for sexual release. A fair appraisal of countless photos and bios of dork-ish “true believers,”—Mohammed’s Atta and Bouyeri, Richard Reid, et al—amply show Muslim suicide murders are not “dominant males.” It’s a uniquely Islamic form of Dawinism or maybe a “Revenge of the Nerds,” except here the nerds die, while the thuggish cleric “jocks” go on and get the girls.
Since we’re talking about words here, a word on Arabic: Linguists have noted the serious structural problems and inaccuracy that plague Arabic dialects and scripts. Also noted is the inaccessibility of Koranic Arabic for most Arabic speakers today. Arabic is a language well-suited to poetry and music—ironic since Muhammad condemned both—but less suited to prose; its syntax often hindering accuracy and imagination. The prose of the Koran, some would say, is testaments to this, consisting of spurious retellings of earlier stories often interlaced with repetitive exhortations to brutalize Jews, Christians and “pagans.” The near total absence of original science fiction in Arabic is another clue of Arabic’s weakness. Many frustrated Arabic writers lament the excessively bellicose exaggeration and vagueness virtually “built in” to the Arabic language, as seen when “surrender” is twisted into “peace.” No doubt these factors add to the high illiteracy and intellectual censorship that permeate the Arab world. Indeed, it even undercuts an educated response to this article, other than the pro forma, “non-Arabic speakers mustn’t discuss Arabic,” generally heard whenever others critique the language sealed, in a way, by the purportedly illiterate Muhammad. Sadly, even an Arabic strong point, the classical period of poetry, is demeaned by Islamists as pre-Islamic Jahiliya.
Finishing, it is probably obvious what Arab and Viking warriors (and Humongous) had in common. Theirs was a violent age that, without agrarian skills, required a philosophy for victory and booty for the tribe, if not always for its individuals. Berserk and Islam were different terms for the same thing—looking death in the face and laughing. It is “the love of death,” as Muslim clerics from Abu Bakr (letter to Persia, A.D. 634, Battle of Qadisiyya) to Hezbolla’s Sheik Nasrallah (“We are going to win, because they love life and we love death."—2004) command. Don’t let an Islamist, a Viking, or a President tell you otherwise.
*Important note:
This is in no way an attack on Arabs or Muslims, whom are people, not ideologies, languages or religions. This article makes no assertions that the facts don’t strongly support, and is no more inflammatory than Edward Said, an Arab supremacist and religious dhimmi, or Noam Chomsky, a professional anti-American, both of whom are darlings of the academic left. Both have attacked the hand that fed them, which is the hand of a progressive culture. Here, on the other hand, the only criticism is toward a regressive, fascistic culture that threatens the world, yet the academic left, maybe due to inertia, still tends to support Said and Chomsky, and condemn writings such as this.
The anger of peoples injured by Islam, but who did not convert, is no doubt tempered by recognition of the sorry state most of the Muslim world itself is in due to Islam, leading to the conclusion that Islam is an accident of history for most, and a conspiracy of only a few. This is most clear when considering the fate of millions of cultural Muslims, fearful that “Whoever changes his religion—kill him" (said by Muhammad; Sahih Bukhari 9.57), is ready to be enforced by armed clerics. In other words, Muslims are shackled in religious slavery, powerless to change anything. It falls to us, not bound by Islam, to provide criticism and reject obvious appeasers who give a false front of respectability to Islam, based on a misunderstanding of multiculturalism, or fear of upsetting the status quo, or simple greed, while millions remain enslaved.
And now, to the Islamists: This article is based on a conversation with the archangel Gabriel, who said he wants to set the record straight.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References: With the advent of search engines, all points of fact in this article can be found online on multiple sources, albeit some more authoritative than others. Here is a non-definitive list:
1. “Islam and CNN's Superstar Christiane Amanpour,” by Lev Navrozov
2. a. Muhammad said: “Do not greet the Jews and the Christians before they greet you and when you meet any one of them on the roads force him to go to the narrowest part of it.” - Sahih Bukhari Book 25, Number 5389
b. Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As-Salamu_Alaykum
3. Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim
4. “Understanding Islam,” by Father Gnana Pragash Suresh,
The Angelus, October 2001, Volume XXIV, Number 10
5. “Sudden Jihad Syndrome” by Daniel Pipes
6. a. The Arabic Language, E. Shouby, Thinkers.net, originally in Middle East Journal, 1951.
b. The Arabic Language, and the Banality of Cruelty
c. “UN Reform and Languages: Strip Arabic from Undeserved Status”
d. “UniPers versus Perso-Arabic”
e. The Almost Complete Lack of the Element of "Futureness," by Achmed A. W. Khammas, October 10, 2006.
(This article was originally written by Max under a pseuodonym for Islam-Watch.org)
....
Thursday, May 15, 2008
A Very Modest Proposal: Repatriating Islamonazis
One thing I've been wrestling with is how to repatriate Islamofascists who have invaded progressive countries. The current method of doing nothing is obviously short sighted. Jailing them until they beg to go home is not effective, as many of their homes are worse than a Western jail (yet they persist on being Islamonazis--go figure), so they stay. Or they claim asylum from persecution by one of their rival Islamonazi sects. Some just never admit to what country they are from, so current standards make it impossible to send them home.
Here is my proposal: Strap on a parachute to them, and air drop them over a hostile Islamic country (they all are). Since Islamonazis insist they are one big "ummah", they should feel right at home, wherever they land. If they don't, my guess is they will immediately tell their new host country where they are really from.
Being a former paratrooper, I can attest to the safety of military-grade chutes. And the strapee does not have to do a thing, the chute automatically deploys upon exist from the aircraft. We're talking at most a few broken ankles for every 1000 dropped. The chutes are a bit pricey, but nothing compared to the cost of the daily evil Islamonazis commit in the West, or giving them welfare, or housing them in jail for months on end. Drop them with a box of MREs, they will do fine, Inshalla.
I suggest this is only carried out on the Islamonazi men, and ALL the imams first. Why send back all those gorgeous Arab women, once they are free of their oppressors? They will drop Islam in a hot second. Then they can finally have the freedom to live and raise children who dream of the stars instead of suicide/murder.
....
The Auto-Genocidal Absurdity of Islamofascist Immigration
And just where does this unbreakable friendship come from? Does it rise up from the earth in great clouds of love? Are we connected at the hip with Israel?
Or maybe it comes from the people, who are in turn influenced by their culture and beliefs, as we can see in the United States, all the way back to George Washington:
The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to
applaud themselves for giving to Mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal
policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience
and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of,
as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the
exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the
United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance,
requires only that they who live under its protection, should demean themselves
as good citizens.May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.
On the eve of the Jewish Sabbath, a 30-year-old man claiming he
was upset about "what was going on in Israel" opened fire at the Jewish
Federation of Greater Seattle building, killing one person and wounding five
women, one of them pregnant."He said, 'I am a Muslim American, angry at Israel,' before
opening fire on everyone," said Marla Meislin-Dietrich, a database coordinator
for the center. "He was randomly shooting at everyone."
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Being Muslim: A license to rape, rob and murder
Can you imagine a group invading the Navajo Reservation, demanding welfare, calling Navajo "kaffir" with a bullhorn, attacking Navajo religious figures and buildings, raping and stealing from Navajo, and calling themselves "Navajo" while disparaging everything about the Navajo, and on and on.
Navajo? None, unless you show you have Navajo ancestry. Ditto for most non-Western countries. 
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Removing the Imams Equals Freeing the People
ISLAMIC Republic of Afghanistan. That's its name. It is one giant mosque. An entire country, and the United States is rebuilding it. What happened to the separation of church and state? Oh stupid me, I was thinking that was figurative, not literal. It doesn't apply to MOSQUE and state, just ask dhimmi Resident W. Bush. He's the uber benefactor to mullahfakirs--using your tax money.
Actually, this is not what the patronizing State Dept expected.The arrogant idiots at the State Dept think a slow, pandering, patronizing process of exposure to modernity will fix Afghanistan, etc. But Afghans are not medieval people, they only use medieval tactics. They are a people controlled by a type of personality--the hyper-aggressive, controlling, criminal thug-type--that Islam aggrandizes and bestows with various titles, such as imam, mullah, sheik, and ayatollah. Each ideology, whether it is islam, democracy, communism, etc., has at its center an ideal personality suited for it. Islam's controllers seek power, especially over women and children, and they hate the idea of majority rule. They also exhibit violence and fear of losing control in regard to sex, which seems to dominate their thinking.Powerful imams have a vested interest in dominating, rather than educating. Remove the cleric, and free the people.
....
Monday, May 12, 2008
Op-ed: Time to expose dhimmi traitors like Grover Norquist
In this sense, dhimmi are the main obstacle to survival of democratic, free peoples, whether it is India, the Philippines, France. etc. Voluntary dhimmis (despicable characters) usher in the age of involuntary dhimmis (pitiable characters).
With this in mind, it is high time we start exposing dhimmi on a systematic basis here in the West. But let's not forget, this is the West. Let's use our heads, before we loss our heads. Here are some ground rules I propose:
1. Dhimmi shall not be harmed physically.
2. Dhimmis are egotistical. Aim at their self-respect.
3. Dhimmi like attention, so shun them.
4. Dhimmi will try to hide, so expose them.
5. Dhimmi are greedy and avaricious for money, so avoid their businesses and fire or don't hire them.
6. Dhimmi don't like being called dhimmi, so call them dhimmi.
7. Dhimmi don't like negative attention, so give it to them.
8. Dhimmi databases should be started by concerned citizens; Google a dhimmi.
That is good enough for now.
Pictured is Grover Norquist, Bush's White House dhimmi traitor.
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Kaffir is the new N-word
Anyone who lets it pass when a Muslim calls them kaffir (or kufr) is ushering in dhimmitude. This word equates not with the slightly medieval, Arthurian-sounding "infidel" that seems silly to Western ears, but to the concept of pure scum, filth, and putrification. That is what this "Muslim" is calling non-Muslims, while driving through London. Who are these "bobbies" who let these islamonazis scream "kaffir" across England with impunity? These bobbies, and their bosses, have no testicles. It remindes me of the Monty Python skit about unarmed bobbies giving chase to a criminal, as they shout: "Stop, or I will yell stop, again!"
....
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Zalmay Khalilzad: America's Islamist UN ambassador
Relatively few know that the United States ambassador to the United Nations is an Afghan immigrant and Muslim named Zalmay Mamozy Khalilzad. "What a wonderful sign of tolerance!", cries the multicultural self-hating leftist, as well as the dhimmi W. Bush. Bush and the Left are one--they uncritically curry favor with those who hate us.
Yes, that's right; as soon as Bush had the chance, he appointed a man from the country that attacked us, and a coreligionist of those that attacked us. Yes, I know, the jihadi terrorists perverted Islam, and this guy is not like that. He's liberal, enlightened, educated, they say.
And I respond: This is exactly what Osama bin Laden wants. Bin Laden is not interested in good Muslims taking over the West. He is interested in ANY Muslims taking over the West. Good, bad, Sunni, Shia, makes no difference for now. That war is for later, once colonization and dhimmification or eradication of non-Muslims is complete. He has said as much.
Nice Muslims only serve to obfuscate that the problem with Islam is a legal one. It doesn't matter what nice Muslims think, if Sharia law is against you. Nazi Germany was loaded with nice Germans, but if the law was against you, well, .... you know the story. Sharia law is inevitable once the Muslim population reaches critical mass. A student of Islam knows there is nothing of substance to distinguish the "moderate Muslim" from the Islamist, because Islam is defined not by them but by the politically powerful imams and mullahs. They must keep Islamic law severe as the day it was written, or risk losing hundreds of millions of members (and all hope of conquering the planet) who wish to leave Islam. Islam is a prison, and the clerics are the wardens, in other words.
Bush's appointment awarded Islamists for their work on 9/11. It is inconceivable that Bush would have chosen an Afghan immigrant for the UN position if it were not for 9/11. Therefore, either Bush is a traitor and Saudi stooge, or he is the most naive person who ever lived. I think both.
If Bush wanted to make a point by way of the ethnicity of his appointment (a dubious concept already), he shoud have chosen a non-Muslim, like a Egyptian Christian Copt or Pakistani Hindu, whose family has been destroyed by Islamist bigots. That would have sent a noble message. But Bush instead choose the road to serfdom.
May it not be too late to reverse course.
....
Alice Walker endorses Ayaan Hirsi Ali. There's hope for the Left!
There I was innocently driving in my car listening and cursing left-wing author Alice Walker as
she was interviewed on CSPAN. Then she does the unimaginable. She endorses right-winger Ayaan Hirsi Ali's book "Infidel."
As any good anti-jihadist knows, Ali is the Somalian immigrant to the Netherlands who is under death threats because of her outspoken antipathy toward Islam, which has left her scarred for life, both literally (female circumscion) and emotionally, from the stress of death threats based in Islamic Sharia "apostate" laws. Ali is also a true intellectual who writes knowledgeably of the giants of Western philosphy, as well as a former politician in the Netherlands before she moved for a time to the United States to work for a conservative think tank.
Walker's endorsement came after her usual left-wing drivel and subtle black
supremacist statements. Oddly, considering the endorsement, there were pro forma condemnations of "religious intolerance" and specifically, anti-Muslim intolerance. It makes one wonder: Did Walker get past the cover of Ali's book? Is Walker aware that Ali was throwing down the gauntlet with Islam? The book is many things, including brilliant, but tolerance is not high on the list. I have no doubt that Walker was drawn to Ali's book because Ali is black. I dare say Walker not only wouldn't endorse the same book if written by a Bosnian ("white") Muslim, she would actively spurn it. It leads one to ask: Do the same facts resonate differently to Walker when a black woman says them than if they were said by a white male speaking about Islam? Experience says yes. This seems to be a defining characteristic of leftists: Facts are judged politically correct or not depending on the person speaking them. With conservatives, a fact is a fact, regardless of who says it.
....
Thursday, May 08, 2008
Immigration Office injecting British Nation with Lethal Virus
Sunday, May 04, 2008
Please leave a comment on an article below. Yes, you!
I'm curious what anyone who happens to read this site thinks. I know a few people do, as I can check Google Analytics. (don't worry, it doesn't show your IP). ....
Culling the population deniers
Pseudo environmentalists, like the Sierra Club's leader Carl Pope (pictured) insist that the West 
should fund efforts to reduce global warming, but few want to take on the driver of environmental destruction--population. That is because the West does not contribute to this problem, only destructive hate cultures, such as Iran's and Saudi Arabia's, with their huge families, and desires to spread Islam every way possible, including demographic conquest.
The dhimmi environmentalists are intimidated by Muslims as well as self-loathing. While environmentalism is a noble cause, it has been dominated by socialist bigots who put the actual environment second behind their more passionate causes--destroying capitalist democracies and ushering in "tribal" or "authentic" cultures that align more nearly with their idealized dreamland. Of course, any alignment is purely superficial, like the five pillars of Islam, which seem just and universal--who doesn't agree with charity and and a little prayer?--but hide the ugliness of dhimmitude, apostate murder, jihad rape and booty, misogyny, etc.
The pseudo-environmentalists who are population deniers, who invite massive numbers of anti-Western bigots into the West, who think Westerners should be denied a cultural heritage, and who advocate destroying only Western borders, should be the first to starve when their biofuel stupidity goes south, and food becomes scarce. These idiots who have done so much damage by stopping nuclear plants from being developed, do not deserve the great mounds of food they consume, while innocent children who have not had the chance to advocate anything, right or wrong, go hungry. Carl POOP grows fat on the 100 million dollars he took to gag any talk by real environmentalists on immigration. The United States is already beyond carrying capacity, and making more high energy Americans is the wrong path. POOP knows it, but its a second priority for him behind social destruction.
....
Hundreds of Churches being defiled as mosques by Muslims are acts of Jihad
Dhimmis must be put on alert that no more churches shall be converted to mosques. This is an act of religious genocide. Dhimmis who insist on collaborating with jihadists will be expelled from the community of respect. They will be shunned, as collaborators with the Nazis were after WWII.
Churches that have been defiled must be returned, just as bones and artifacts are returned to American Indian tribes. These churches are the heritage of their people, not of recent arrivals bent on religious domination, gender segregation and anti-"kaffir" hatred.
The same conversion to mosques has been happening to synagogues as well as Hindu and Buddhist temples in Asia, lest we think this is just a Christian or Western thing.
Final note: A myth that is common about the famous cathedral in Cordoba, Spain is that it was originally a mosque. Actually, it was originally a Visigothic cathedral that was converted to a mosque by the invading Muslim Moors, and then returned back to a cathedral when native Christians again reclaimed their heritage. Don't let superficial history repeated by dhimmis and Muslims fool you.
....Friday, May 02, 2008
Austria purges its evil, will Dar al ISLAM?
Such Islamic marriages, of course, are completely fine under most Islamic countries, because it is in accordance with Mohammad's own marriage to Aisha, age six, and his penetration of her when she was 9, and he was in his 50s.
Celebrities who aid Jihadist Terror
eckham has bought real estate 
in this Islamic supremacist kingdom, and Woods in designing a golf course there. I guess being near-billionaires isn't enough to buy a brain or some morals. Or even good advisors, in case they're too busy to read up on the hate that inspired 9/11 and 7/7. If they think Dubai is "tolerant" then maybe they should try proselytising some other religion besides Islam there. Or try marrying and converting a Dubai citizen away from Islam. Or, after you marry, mention you'd like to become a Dubain citizen, but remain non-Muslim. Yeah, the answer to all is "not if you value your life." There is a good reason Congress, despite the traitors in it, ultimately defeated the attempt of Dubai to buy up American port security operations--It is an nation of jihadist-financing Islamist bigots.Lynch-mob leader Sharpton issues veiled threat of murder
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Time to revoke Tony "the collaborator" Blair's Britishness
Church's Fried Sharia Terrorist Chicken on Army's Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Monday, April 28, 2008
Another dangerous dhimmi: Rep. James Moran, Va.
The Saudi Islamic Academy remains ensconsed in the old MOUNT VERNON High School building along Rt. 1 in Jame's Moran's congressional district in Virginia. Yes, that Mount Vernon--the land once titled to our first President, George Washington. Thus far, its most famous graduate is sitting in jail, guilty of hatching a plot to assasinate President Bush. (This kid must have missed the memo that Bush is the real Manchirean candidate, for Saudi Arabia).
Jame Moran is the dangerous dhimmi who continues to pretend "nothing here, folks, just move along". He is generally a machine politician more interested in his ego, but occasionally ventures beyond his own ass to express his innermost sentiments, and they are not pretty. Several times he's made anti-semitic statements, by blaming Middle East problems on Jews or Israel. Also, he has an extensive campaign to grovel to Muslims in his district, including now-jailed terrorist Abdurahman Alamoudi.
James has got to go and be replaced by an anti-dhimmi politician. The ISA (as the tiny sign says in front, due to its attempt at a low profile) is a Saudi terrorist training ground on US soil. It must be shut down. This is the goal. It will be achieved, as part of a campaign to stop all investment by the Saudis until this vulgur nation allows churches, synogogues and temples to be build on its soil for its guest workers, and allow any Saudi to leave Islam if they so desire, without threat of death. If Moran disagrees with this, he must be shunned and expelled from the community of decency.
....
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Bush is a de facto traitor
I am far from a self-loathing, anti-American leftist, but occasionally I will agree with them in a general sense, as in this time: Bush is no good for America. (But neither is Obama, Clinton, or McCain for that matter). ....
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Minnesota Public Schools Commisioner: Alice Seagren, Q.K.D. (Quisling, Kapo, Dhimmi)
Your actions would be awful even if it were not the religion that proclaims itself superior to all, and threatens with death anyone who wishes to leave it. Not to mention 9/11 and daily attacks on diverse peoples over the globe. You have thrown out all principal because you are a coward, a kapo, a quisling, and now--a dhimmi (look it up).
The bloggers of America will make sure your name is mud.
------
Here's the tepid responds:
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. ....
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Thug/Rapist Mullahs and Imams' rapist/racist fantasies:
Following are excerpts of a video-clip featuring Saudi cleric Omar Al-Sweilem, which was posted on the Internet. The video quality is low in the original.Omar Al-Sweilem: Harith Ibn Al-Muhasibi told us what would happen when we meet the black-eyed virgin with her black hair and white face- praised be He who created night and day. What hair! What a chest! What a mouth! What cheeks! What a figure! What breasts! What thighs! What legs! What whiteness! What softness! Without any creams -no Nivea, no vaseline. No nothing! He said that faces would be soft that day. Even your own face will be soft without any powder or makeup. You yourself will be soflt, so how soft will a black-eyed virgin be, when she comes to you so tall and with her beautiful face, her black hair and white face - praised be He who created night and day. Just feel her palm, Sheik! He said: How soft will a fingertip be, after being softened in paradise for thousands of years! There is no god but Allah. He told us that if you entered one of the palaces, you would find ten black-eyed virgins sprawled on musk cushions. Where is Abu Khaled? Here, he has arrived! When they see you, they will get up and run to you. Lucky is the one who gets to put her thumb in your hand. When they get hold of you, they will push you onto your back, on the musk cushions. They will push you onto your back, Jamal! Allah Akbar! I wish this on all people present here. He said that one of them would place her mouth on yours. Do whatever you want. Another one would press her cheek against yours, yet another would press her chest against yours, and the others would await their turn. There is no god but Allah. He told us that one black-eyed virgin would give you a glass of wine. Wine in Paradise is a reward for your good deeds. The wine of this world is destructive, but not the wine of the world to come.
The Islamonazi Nexus
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Erica Jong: Innumerate Bigot
Erica Jong, a largely spent 70’s novelist and feminist, made Drudge Report recently with her Huffington Post blog essay “Who’s Tired of Pink?,“ a frantic attack on all thinks white and male. “Pink” is apparently the Left’s new term for disparaging whites. Good luck with that, Erica; it has all the devastation of “honky” or “cracker.”
But the “pink” term is not the problem with Jong‘s tirade. The problem is Erica’s amazing lack of math comprehension—ironic for a feminist fighting stereotypes. It is safe to say that math rarely, if ever, enters the mind of Jong when she pens opening lines like, “I am so tired of pink men bombing brown children and rationalizing it as fighting terrorism.”
Now let’s see, Erica. It’s obvious your guilty “pink men” are whites of European ancestry. Such whites, both men and women, account for about 10% (and falling) of the world’s population. That of course means 90% (and growing) of the world are the Left’s so-called “people of color.” The Left‘s “Other” is not very other, in other words, and never have been. According to Erica’s logic, or lack thereof, whites must limit themselves to debating only with other whites, lest a confrontation arises with the remaining 90% of the world the Left lumps together in its artificial bifurcation of humanity.
Further, 90% of the world is encouraged by the Left to resent and even attack whites for many indirect reasons ranging from past colonialism and slavery to capitalism and something called “white privilege.” Remember, as Erica hints at in her dishonest attempt at nuance, even though the vast majority may commit crimes, it is merely a reaction to whites. Mao, Pot, Amin, Saddam, Osama, et al, were/are naturally meek lambs driven to violence by whites as acts of desperation. In the theology of Nation of Islam’s Farrakhan, recently honored by Barak Obama’s spiritual chum, Jeremiah Wright, Rev...Continued on The New Media Journal
....
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Dutch PM Balkenende: Kapo Quisling Dhimmi
There has come to be a certain type of Western politician elevated in declining, sick societies. These pols straddle two peoples, so they are not stable entities. First, they grovel to the newcomer, by ridiculing the traditional culture. This makes the newcomer feel welcome. Meanwhile, this pol also tries to pacify the natives, as it were, by appealing to our lowest instinct--state welfare.
We see this pol type in the likes of Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and the Dutch PM Jan Balkenende: pols that would not be elected dog catcher in times of national confidence. These pols depend on a house divided, dhimming for the votes of newcomers not numerically strong enough to simply elect from their own, but who need a Judas that would hang the native population. Call them kapoliticians, if you will, from the term kapo, used for Jews who aided the nazis in order to eek out a few more weeks of life. In reality, these pols are far worse, since they are eeking out not sheer life, but a few pathetic years of high "service" before the onslaught of Eurabia, or worse, liquidation by Red China once the West is devolved sufficiently.
So we highlight here, Balkenende, for his evil work against the service of Geert Wilders and his film, Fitna. Balkenende, winning with the Islamist vote, would take down... a millenium of Dutch culture for a few months of personal "glory."
We, the genuinely progressive, rational, humane West, must determine how to deal the Balkenendes before it is beyond hope. He and other such pols are winning with the enemy's vote. This is unjust. These pols, like such Democrats in the United States, as well as not a few Republicans, invite anti-Westerners in, in order to buy their vote. It is a self-serving machine that could be perpetual right up to the minute democracies morph into theocracies or dictatorships.
The rational Western mind has the power to stop this without barbarism. Balkenende and his sort are loathsome, but they crave attention and honors. We must stop honoring them. Where they walk they should be jeered and denied service, whoever associates with them, they must be informed they are associating with one who would destoy our civilization for a song, so long as it happens after their term of office.
Once the kapos are out of office, we can begin to restore our culture, first by rescinding the paper-citizenship of the Islamists, given out during a time of cultural weakness. This is not a call for a fascism, as the paranoid and the colluding project onto this generation's confident members. We ask for nothing more, and probably less, certainly per capita, than that which the Dali Lama wants for his people.
....
The Mother Jones Commission to get Muslims Turned On to Sufism: A Play from 2004
Sonny: “If only all the Sunni and Shiite Muslims would practice to Sufi Islam, we could all live in peace,” said Sonny, a contemplative American peacenik, as he sat among his Earth First! Direct action protest kits.
Janis: “Yeah, that would be great, especially the Wahabbis, they seem to be the most violent. I read that they have only been around since the 1700’s, it’s not like they’re legitimate or anything,” agreed Janis, a one-time art student at U.C. Santa Cruz.
Sonny: We ought to go to a mosque and teach Muslims about Sufism. We can call it the Mother Jones Commission to Convert Muslims to Sufism.
Janis: Yeah, that would be great. Do we need to ask Mother Jones magazine if we can use their name like that?
Sonny: No, they’re cool like that. They’re not all into that corporate identity stuff. It will be great.
Janis: I like the name, except the part about converting. That sounds so Christian and white. What about “turn on” instead of convert?
Sonny: Yeah, that does sound better. I hate when I sound like that. Thanks for correcting me.
Janis: I don’t know if I know that much about Sufism though, especially to teach it.
Sonny: Why are you all worried? Sufism is cool. It’s all about paradox, man. Whatever the Koran says, you can do the opposite of. That’s why Sufis drink alcohol. It’s also really peaceful and spiritual.”
Janis: Yeah, that’s what I heard. I didn’t know about the paradox part though. That’s interesting.
Next Saturday:
Sonny: Man, I thought that Muslims went to mosque on Saturday, like Jewish people.
Janis: Yeah, so did I. I guess we’ll have to try next Thursday evening.
Next Thursday
Sonny: Hi, we wanted to talk to you about Sufism.
Imam: Are you Sufi?
Sonny: Well, no, not yet, but I was thinking of becoming one. It is a really peaceful religion.
Imam: So, you are interested in getting some information about Sufism. Well, this is a Wahabbi mosque. Why don’t we teach you about Wahabbism. I think once you understand it, you will find it to be just what you are looking for. It is a very peaceful religion, much more so than Sufism, which does not unders